Also, silly question on 4.9: We have CCM - IPIPGW - CCME
CCM to IPIPGW to CCME is H323 to SIP CCME to IPIPGW to CCM is H323 to SIP If I am reading it correctly Then it says to ensure when calls are coming from SIP to H323 that we strip RFC2833.... but we aren't going from SIP to H323, just the other way around... I also thought SIP to H323 wasn't supported... Jonathan On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Gregory Jost (grjost) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh. I guess that would be "literally" huh... :) > > I only know what I talking about a fraction of the time. Maybe I should > stay off these forums. > > > > Greg Jost > Network Consulting Engineer > Unified Communications Practice > Cisco Systems, Inc. > 214-274-1922 > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:13 AM > To: Gregory Jost (grjost) > Cc: Jacob Owen; CCIE Voice > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Non-GK ICT from CCM to CCME? > > They have a screenshot of the non-GK ICT being created.... > > > Jonathan > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Gregory Jost (grjost) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think ICT is being used figuratively here (e.g. a trunk between > > disparate systems), not literally. > > > > > > Greg Jost > > Network Consulting Engineer > > Unified Communications Practice > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > 214-274-1922 > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan > > Charles > > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:03 AM > > To: Jacob Owen > > Cc: CCIE Voice > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Non-GK ICT from CCM to CCME? > > > > No, I am looking at the solution thingy, and it shows a non-GK > > controlled ICT trunk... bizarre... I thought this was exclusively for > > connecting to another CCM cluster... in fact, the SRND says so... > > > > Never tried hooking it up to an IPIPGW... > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Jonathan, > > > The 172.x.10y.1 addresses are the loopbacks for the > > > devices: > > > > > > 172.x.100.1 - HQ Router (x is pod number) > > > 172.x.101.1 - BR1 Router > > > 172.x.102.1 - BR2 Router > > > > > > I think it's probably an ICT trunk to an H323 > > > Gatekeeper but I don't have the book handy. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Does this work? Looking at solution for 4.9 in the > > > > workbook, and it > > > > shows a regular ICT but the IP address, 172.1.100.1 > > > > doesn't match up > > > > to anything... I am curious what it is... > > > > > > > > BR2's loopback should be 172.X.102.1 not 100.1... > > > > typo or am I lost? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jacob Owen > > > CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCVP, CCDP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ____________ > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and > > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > > > >
