It looks accurate to me. And if you have ACL A applied to the port and ACL B applied to the vlan the host device is on, the port ACL supercedes the vlan ACL.
Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Jost (grjost) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 policers Is the following an accurate statement? A microflow or aggregate policer applies to the ACL, not to the port or VLAN. For instance, a policer/ACL can be applied to port(s), vlan(s), or combination of vlan(s) and port(s); therefore, the following should hold true: Microflow - polices on a per flow basis originating from any devices on any of to the ports or vlans to which the ACL is applied. Aggregate - polices sum of all traffic originating from any devices on any of to the ports or vlans to which the ACL is applied. Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922
