What about the ATA and the VG248? Each RJ-11 is a unique SCCP endpoint (unique MAC). There's a single IP per device, but each analog phone is using a unique port to transmit to TCP 2000 on both the PUB and SUB, therefore there are 2 flows per analog phone. I'm guessing a microflow policer should be used here per port, although I don't think it is 100% correct.
Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922 ________________________________ From: Gregory Jost (grjost) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 7:22 PM To: Gregory Jost (grjost); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Cc: Randy Hicks Jr. (rhicksjr) Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 policers Actually, I think the aggregate solution is more correct. An IP Phone will send SCCP keepalives to every CM in its CMG. This would be multiple flows. This bandwidth is negligible, but so is any other SCCP. If the question stated "SCCP traffic," I think you would have to go with an aggregate policer. Correct? Also, your PC port could be allowed access to the voice VLAN, in which case there could be IP Communicator running on the attached PC. This would be another SCCP flow. Thoughts? Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922 ________________________________ From: Gregory Jost (grjost) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 7:10 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [email protected] Cc: Randy Hicks Jr. (rhicksjr) Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 policers OK... If you're asked to police EACH phone's SCCP, then you could use EITHER an aggregate policer (unique ACL applied to each port), OR a microflow policer (ACL applied to the voice vlan). Correct? The latter requires less configuration (IPExpert solution), but the former can be taken straight out of the SRND. In fact, the ACL naming convention used in the SRND specifies the mod/port. Do both solutions work for this question? Is one preferred over the other? What's the proctor looking for? Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922 ________________________________ From: Vik Malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:39 PM To: Gregory Jost (grjost); [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 policers It looks accurate to me. And if you have ACL A applied to the port and ACL B applied to the vlan the host device is on, the port ACL supercedes the vlan ACL. Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Jost (grjost) Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 policers Is the following an accurate statement? A microflow or aggregate policer applies to the ACL, not to the port or VLAN. For instance, a policer/ACL can be applied to port(s), vlan(s), or combination of vlan(s) and port(s); therefore, the following should hold true: Microflow - polices on a per flow basis originating from any devices on any of to the ports or vlans to which the ACL is applied. Aggregate - polices sum of all traffic originating from any devices on any of to the ports or vlans to which the ACL is applied. Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922
