gatekeeper zone local CCM ipexpert.com 172.1.100.1 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 9.9.9.9 1719 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011* zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 0 CME zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 0 CME zone prefix PSTN-WAN 3* zone prefix PSTN-WAN 617* zone prefix PSTN-WAN 911* zone prefix PSTN-WAN 999* gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown
your priority statement here will only affect calls coming from CME, to make PUB the primary call processor, in your call manager group for the Phone, move PUB to the top of the list. you can verify this by making a call to the CME site and use sh gatekeeper calls on the GK On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: LAB in five days (Craig Hill (crahill)) > 2. Re: LAB in five days (sean hurricane) > 3. Re: Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem (jeremy co) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:41:02 -0700 > From: "Craig Hill (crahill)" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days > To: "sean hurricane" <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > < > 73b12e1848ff144e84ef158b079a6e7c05bed...@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I have taken it 2 times and I was very close to making it the last > round. I would advise you to do the following: > > 1. Have a plan on how your going to attack the exam and stick to it. My > first attempt I went in with no plan and it cost me time. > 2. Practice speed drills after you formulate your plan, try to > incorporate changes each time that will keep you thinking ahead. > 3. Practice complete lab build ups and time yourself. My personal goal > for my second attempt, other than passing, was to be done with the > Infrastructure, QOS, and CME/CUE before lunch. I didnt register a single > non-cme phone until about the 6th hour, but that was the way I planned > it. > 3. Read the whole test and look for dependencies. When you spot them, > make a note of them. > 4. You will more than likely run into some problems, write them down and > move on. Don't get wrapped up in troubleshooting for more than a few > minutes or else you will kill your time. Your lunch break is probably > the best time to think about what could be wrong. > 5. Watch the free IP Expert seminars for voice, there is some invaluable > information in there. > 6. Follow the SRND for your qos values when doing your calculations. > There is a lot of contradictory information out there and I have even > seen people on this board hand out advice on what they think it should > be, which you will be wrong if you follow it. I scored perfect on the > qos sections and I practiced my calculations based completely from the > SRND values. Again, watch the videos on IP expert. > > > Good luck. > > Craig > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sean > hurricane > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days > > > > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have > passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i > have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from > those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/06046ec9/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:51:49 -0400 > From: sean hurricane <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days > To: Michael Ciarfello <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > I don't believe i said anything about NDA, regarding IPCC, integration is > not my problem and i can do most of the scripting, i am not just at a > confident level where i can say scripting is a non-issue. if the script are > as lengthy and difficult as ipexpert lab then i may struggle and just roll > the dice on that portion of the lab. if not with lady luck on my side i > should triumph. > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Michael Ciarfello > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I have no nda stuff to share (either should anyone else) so no need for > > private e-mail. > > > > > > > > Taken from my experience: If it?s your first time you will meet the > > following: > > > > Unfamiliar with environment. Unfamiliar with the PC, can?t beat the > > nervousness, the anxiety, the frustrations you will encounter, the > > anxiousness?no matter how you say to yourself that you are ok. > > > > > > > > Remember you only have a 20 point margin. If you get IPCC questions and > > they are worth 5-10-whatever points, your margin dropped by a LOT. > > > > > > > > You will encounter small problems on the test that didn?t happen during > > your studies. These take time to fix (because you are an expert and know > > how to fix them) but eat up your time. A lot of people say most people > > don?t finish due to running out of time. I knew how to do EVERY > question. > > I didn?t have time to properly test everything?taking a lot of questions > on > > faith that they worked. I also couldn?t get things to work that I knew > how > > to do from customer experience and practiced in the lab many times and > when > > I got home and tried it, it also worked. Could have also been just mental > > blocks. > > > > > > > > I?d say at the 5 hour mark, you better have a running tally of how many > > points you think you have. If not over 80, you better work on the low > > hanging fruit to try to get those points back. At the 6 hour mark, your > > configurations are supposed to be complete and you test for 2 hours. If > > your tally is not above 80, then you get into my situation of taking some > > things on faith, testing others and resolving issues on others. > > > > > > > > You should know whether you passed or failed during the test. If you > think > > you got everything correct and you end up failing (which I?ve heard from > > people,) then you were kidding yourself somewhere. You should know in > your > > configurations and your testing whether it worked or not. There are > always > > the points for ?what the proctor was looking for?, but I don?t think > there > > are 20 points worth of those. > > > > > > > > I wish you luck, but your statement ?but for the most part i have most of > > the topic down cold? you will wish you never wrote. It will haunt you. > And > > I do believe some of the test is luck and things falling into place vs > > giving trouble just to give trouble. Karma is huge. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *sean hurricane > > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 12:29 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days > > > > > > > > my e-mail address is [email protected] if anyone wants to contact me > > privately. > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have > passed. > > i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have most > of > > the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who > > failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/1b87b087/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:21 +1000 > From: jeremy co <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > To: Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I have a prefix for it so why it didn't show up? > > gatekeeper > zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 > zone local CCM cisco.com > no zone subnet CME default enable > zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable > no zone subnet CCM default enable > zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable > zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable > zone prefix CME 2404.... > zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 > zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 > zone prefix CCM 408* > zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 > zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 > zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 > gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology > no shutdown > > GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE > ========================= > Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) > Zone CCM master gateway list: > 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 > Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): > Priority 9: > 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > They can overlap. It's okay for it to be that way as long as you have > > zone prefixes defined. Or give it a different prefix....but you need one > in > > there for it to show up under that command. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> > > *To:* marwa <[email protected]> > > *Cc:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 10:37 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > > > > 1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM config > > > > > > Jeremy > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, marwa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> hi, > >> to see it add the tech prefix under the interface in cme > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > >> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> > >> *To:* Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> ; Sergio Polizer< > [email protected]> > >> *Cc:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Arshad Dhunna< > [email protected]>; > >> [email protected] > >> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:24 PM > >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> interface Loopback0 > >> ip address 150.1.66.254 255.255.255.0 > >> h323-gateway voip interface > >> h323-gateway voip id CME ipaddr 150.1.64.114 1719 > >> h323-gateway voip h323-id RS2 > >> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 150.1.66.254 > >> > >> > >> CME is registered. > >> > >> C2600#sh gatekeeper end > >> GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION > >> ================================ > >> CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type > >> Flags > >> --------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- > >> ----- > >> 150.1.64.11 2059 150.1.64.11 3776 CCM VOIP-GW > >> H323-ID: GK_Trunk_1 > >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 > >> 150.1.66.254 1720 150.1.66.254 50245 CME VOIP-GW > >> E164-ID: 6003 > >> E164-ID: 6004 > >> H323-ID: RS2 > >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 > >> Total number of active registrations = 2 > >> > >> > >> I made a call with dot configuration and it worked. > >> ANy way why I cannot see CME under sh gatekeeper gw? > >> > >> Sergio I have them under gw interface > >> > >> > >> Any idea? > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Jeremy > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> Just because the dots show up doesn't mean they will work....but heck, > >>> give it a try. We all might learn something. > >>> > >>> If CME won't register, what does the output of the show gateway command > >>> on CME show? And please post the configuration of the interface where > you > >>> engaged the h323-gateway commands. > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> > >>> *To:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Cliff McGlamry< > [email protected]>; Arshad > >>> Dhunna <[email protected]> > >>> *Cc:* [email protected] > >>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM > >>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > >>> > >>> > >>> complete configuration is here: > >>> SUB is not started though. > >>> > >>> gatekeeper > >>> zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 > >>> zone local CCM cisco.com > >>> no zone subnet CME default enable > >>> zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable > >>> no zone subnet CCM default enable > >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable > >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable > >>> zone prefix CME 2404.... > >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 > >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 > >>> zone prefix CCM 408* > >>> zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 > >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 > >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 > >>> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology > >>> no shutdown > >>> > >>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE > >>> ========================= > >>> Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) > >>> Zone CCM master gateway list: > >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 > >>> Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): > >>> Priority 9: > >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 > >>> > >>> > >>> configuration with dot style is working. like 3... instead of 3* > >>> > >>> but I cannot see CME under show gatekeeper gw command > >>> > >>> Any idea? > >>> > >>> > >>> Jeremy > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Marwa Ahmed <[email protected] > >wrote: > >>> > >>>> hi, > >>>> > >>>> is the cme registered? also do u have another local zone called CME > >>>> other than CCM > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------ > >>>> *From:* [email protected] on behalf of jeremy co > >>>> *Sent:* Thu 4/16/2009 7:55 PM > >>>> *To:* [email protected] > >>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I cannot make trunk prefix and GW priority showing up under "sh > >>>> gatekeeper gw" > >>>> > >>>> zone local CCM cisco.com > >>>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 > >>>> no shutdown > >>>> > >>>> GK#sh gatekeeper g > >>>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE > >>>> ========================= > >>>> > >>>> I got nothing here > >>>> > >>>> any idea? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jeremy > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090418/c70671de/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > [email protected] > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101 > ******************************************* >
