then your config as is with the priority should work, you may may wanna make the priority something like 10 and 7.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Tech Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > You are correct, my goal is to make the PUB the preferred gateway for > Calls that originates from the CME. What, you referred to was the other way > round.. > > Goal: > Call from CME to CCM-->use PUB first, then SUB.(still a problem....) > Call from CCM to CME-->use SUB first, then PUB (this has been achieve via > CallManager group). > > Thanks. > > > Tech Guy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* sean hurricane <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 2:13 PM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101 > > I meant call manager group for the device pool of the phone. > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:12 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected]>wrote: > >> gatekeeper >> zone local CCM ipexpert.com 172.1.100.1 >> >> zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 9.9.9.9 1719 >> zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011* >> zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority >> >> zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 >> zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 0 CME >> zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority >> zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 >> >> >> zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 0 CME >> zone prefix PSTN-WAN 3* >> zone prefix PSTN-WAN 617* >> zone prefix PSTN-WAN 911* >> zone prefix PSTN-WAN 999* >> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >> no shutdown >> >> your priority statement here will only affect calls coming from CME, to make >> PUB the primary call processor, in your call manager group >> for the Phone, move PUB to the top of the list. you can verify this by >> making a call to the CME site and use sh gatekeeper calls on the GK >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: LAB in five days (Craig Hill (crahill)) >>> 2. Re: LAB in five days (sean hurricane) >>> 3. Re: Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem (jeremy co) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:41:02 -0700 >>> From: "Craig Hill (crahill)" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >>> To: "sean hurricane" <[email protected]>, >>> <[email protected]> >>> Message-ID: >>> < >>> 73b12e1848ff144e84ef158b079a6e7c05bed...@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>> >>> I have taken it 2 times and I was very close to making it the last >>> round. I would advise you to do the following: >>> >>> 1. Have a plan on how your going to attack the exam and stick to it. My >>> first attempt I went in with no plan and it cost me time. >>> 2. Practice speed drills after you formulate your plan, try to >>> incorporate changes each time that will keep you thinking ahead. >>> 3. Practice complete lab build ups and time yourself. My personal goal >>> for my second attempt, other than passing, was to be done with the >>> Infrastructure, QOS, and CME/CUE before lunch. I didnt register a single >>> non-cme phone until about the 6th hour, but that was the way I planned >>> it. >>> 3. Read the whole test and look for dependencies. When you spot them, >>> make a note of them. >>> 4. You will more than likely run into some problems, write them down and >>> move on. Don't get wrapped up in troubleshooting for more than a few >>> minutes or else you will kill your time. Your lunch break is probably >>> the best time to think about what could be wrong. >>> 5. Watch the free IP Expert seminars for voice, there is some invaluable >>> information in there. >>> 6. Follow the SRND for your qos values when doing your calculations. >>> There is a lot of contradictory information out there and I have even >>> seen people on this board hand out advice on what they think it should >>> be, which you will be wrong if you follow it. I scored perfect on the >>> qos sections and I practiced my calculations based completely from the >>> SRND values. Again, watch the videos on IP expert. >>> >>> >>> Good luck. >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sean >>> hurricane >>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:26 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >>> >>> >>> >>> My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have >>> passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i >>> have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from >>> those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/06046ec9/attachment-0001.htm >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:51:49 -0400 >>> From: sean hurricane <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >>> To: Michael Ciarfello <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >>> >>> I don't believe i said anything about NDA, regarding IPCC, integration is >>> not my problem and i can do most of the scripting, i am not just at a >>> confident level where i can say scripting is a non-issue. if the script >>> are >>> as lengthy and difficult as ipexpert lab then i may struggle and just >>> roll >>> the dice on that portion of the lab. if not with lady luck on my side i >>> should triumph. >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Michael Ciarfello >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> > I have no nda stuff to share (either should anyone else) so no need >>> for >>> > private e-mail. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Taken from my experience: If it?s your first time you will meet the >>> > following: >>> > >>> > Unfamiliar with environment. Unfamiliar with the PC, can?t beat the >>> > nervousness, the anxiety, the frustrations you will encounter, the >>> > anxiousness?no matter how you say to yourself that you are ok. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Remember you only have a 20 point margin. If you get IPCC questions >>> and >>> > they are worth 5-10-whatever points, your margin dropped by a LOT. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > You will encounter small problems on the test that didn?t happen during >>> > your studies. These take time to fix (because you are an expert and >>> know >>> > how to fix them) but eat up your time. A lot of people say most people >>> > don?t finish due to running out of time. I knew how to do EVERY >>> question. >>> > I didn?t have time to properly test everything?taking a lot of >>> questions on >>> > faith that they worked. I also couldn?t get things to work that I knew >>> how >>> > to do from customer experience and practiced in the lab many times and >>> when >>> > I got home and tried it, it also worked. Could have also been just >>> mental >>> > blocks. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I?d say at the 5 hour mark, you better have a running tally of how many >>> > points you think you have. If not over 80, you better work on the low >>> > hanging fruit to try to get those points back. At the 6 hour mark, >>> your >>> > configurations are supposed to be complete and you test for 2 hours. >>> If >>> > your tally is not above 80, then you get into my situation of taking >>> some >>> > things on faith, testing others and resolving issues on others. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > You should know whether you passed or failed during the test. If you >>> think >>> > you got everything correct and you end up failing (which I?ve heard >>> from >>> > people,) then you were kidding yourself somewhere. You should know in >>> your >>> > configurations and your testing whether it worked or not. There are >>> always >>> > the points for ?what the proctor was looking for?, but I don?t think >>> there >>> > are 20 points worth of those. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I wish you luck, but your statement ?but for the most part i have most >>> of >>> > the topic down cold? you will wish you never wrote. It will haunt you. >>> And >>> > I do believe some of the test is luck and things falling into place vs >>> > giving trouble just to give trouble. Karma is huge. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>> > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *sean hurricane >>> > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 12:29 PM >>> > *To:* [email protected] >>> > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > my e-mail address is [email protected] if anyone wants to contact >>> me >>> > privately. >>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected] >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have >>> passed. >>> > i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have >>> most of >>> > the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who >>> > failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/1b87b087/attachment-0001.htm >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:21 +1000 >>> From: jeremy co <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >>> To: Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >>> >>> I have a prefix for it so why it didn't show up? >>> >>> gatekeeper >>> zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 >>> zone local CCM cisco.com >>> no zone subnet CME default enable >>> zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable >>> no zone subnet CCM default enable >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable >>> zone prefix CME 2404.... >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 >>> zone prefix CCM 408* >>> zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 >>> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >>> no shutdown >>> >>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >>> ========================= >>> Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) >>> Zone CCM master gateway list: >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >>> Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): >>> Priority 9: >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > They can overlap. It's okay for it to be that way as long as you have >>> > zone prefixes defined. Or give it a different prefix....but you need >>> one in >>> > there for it to show up under that command. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >>> > *To:* marwa <[email protected]> >>> > *Cc:* [email protected] >>> > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 10:37 AM >>> > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >>> > >>> > 1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM >>> config >>> > >>> > >>> > Jeremy >>> > >>> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, marwa <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> hi, >>> >> to see it add the tech prefix under the interface in cme >>> >> >>> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >> >>> >> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >>> >> *To:* Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> ; Sergio Polizer< >>> [email protected]> >>> >> *Cc:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Arshad Dhunna< >>> [email protected]>; >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:24 PM >>> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> interface Loopback0 >>> >> ip address 150.1.66.254 255.255.255.0 >>> >> h323-gateway voip interface >>> >> h323-gateway voip id CME ipaddr 150.1.64.114 1719 >>> >> h323-gateway voip h323-id RS2 >>> >> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 150.1.66.254 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> CME is registered. >>> >> >>> >> C2600#sh gatekeeper end >>> >> GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION >>> >> ================================ >>> >> CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type >>> >> Flags >>> >> --------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- >>> >> ----- >>> >> 150.1.64.11 2059 150.1.64.11 3776 CCM VOIP-GW >>> >> H323-ID: GK_Trunk_1 >>> >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >>> >> 150.1.66.254 1720 150.1.66.254 50245 CME VOIP-GW >>> >> E164-ID: 6003 >>> >> E164-ID: 6004 >>> >> H323-ID: RS2 >>> >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >>> >> Total number of active registrations = 2 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I made a call with dot configuration and it worked. >>> >> ANy way why I cannot see CME under sh gatekeeper gw? >>> >> >>> >> Sergio I have them under gw interface >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Any idea? >>> >> >>> >> Cheers >>> >> >>> >> Jeremy >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Just because the dots show up doesn't mean they will work....but >>> heck, >>> >>> give it a try. We all might learn something. >>> >>> >>> >>> If CME won't register, what does the output of the show gateway >>> command >>> >>> on CME show? And please post the configuration of the interface >>> where you >>> >>> engaged the h323-gateway commands. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >>> >>> *To:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Cliff McGlamry< >>> [email protected]>; Arshad >>> >>> Dhunna <[email protected]> >>> >>> *Cc:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> complete configuration is here: >>> >>> SUB is not started though. >>> >>> >>> >>> gatekeeper >>> >>> zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 >>> >>> zone local CCM cisco.com >>> >>> no zone subnet CME default enable >>> >>> zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable >>> >>> no zone subnet CCM default enable >>> >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable >>> >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable >>> >>> zone prefix CME 2404.... >>> >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 >>> >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 >>> >>> zone prefix CCM 408* >>> >>> zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 >>> >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >>> >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 >>> >>> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >>> >>> no shutdown >>> >>> >>> >>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >>> >>> ========================= >>> >>> Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) >>> >>> Zone CCM master gateway list: >>> >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >>> >>> Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): >>> >>> Priority 9: >>> >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> configuration with dot style is working. like 3... instead of 3* >>> >>> >>> >>> but I cannot see CME under show gatekeeper gw command >>> >>> >>> >>> Any idea? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jeremy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Marwa Ahmed < >>> [email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> is the cme registered? also do u have another local zone called CME >>> >>>> other than CCM >>> >>>> >>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>> >>>> *From:* [email protected] on behalf of jeremy >>> co >>> >>>> *Sent:* Thu 4/16/2009 7:55 PM >>> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I cannot make trunk prefix and GW priority showing up under "sh >>> >>>> gatekeeper gw" >>> >>>> >>> >>>> zone local CCM cisco.com >>> >>>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >>> >>>> no shutdown >>> >>>> >>> >>>> GK#sh gatekeeper g >>> >>>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >>> >>>> ========================= >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I got nothing here >>> >>>> >>> >>>> any idea? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Jeremy >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090418/c70671de/attachment.htm >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CCIE_Voice mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >>> >>> >>> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101 >>> ******************************************* >>> >> >> >
