I meant call manager group for the device pool of the phone. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:12 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected]>wrote:
> gatekeeper > zone local CCM ipexpert.com 172.1.100.1 > zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 9.9.9.9 1719 > zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011* > zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority > > zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 > zone prefix CCM 10* gw-priority 0 CME > zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_3 <---PUB have highest priority > zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_4 > > zone prefix CCM 20* gw-priority 0 CME > zone prefix PSTN-WAN 3* > zone prefix PSTN-WAN 617* > zone prefix PSTN-WAN 911* > zone prefix PSTN-WAN 999* > gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology > no shutdown > > your priority statement here will only affect calls coming from CME, to make > PUB the primary call processor, in your call manager group > for the Phone, move PUB to the top of the list. you can verify this by making > a call to the CME site and use sh gatekeeper calls on the GK > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: LAB in five days (Craig Hill (crahill)) >> 2. Re: LAB in five days (sean hurricane) >> 3. Re: Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem (jeremy co) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:41:02 -0700 >> From: "Craig Hill (crahill)" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >> To: "sean hurricane" <[email protected]>, >> <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> < >> 73b12e1848ff144e84ef158b079a6e7c05bed...@xmb-sjc-213.amer.cisco.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> I have taken it 2 times and I was very close to making it the last >> round. I would advise you to do the following: >> >> 1. Have a plan on how your going to attack the exam and stick to it. My >> first attempt I went in with no plan and it cost me time. >> 2. Practice speed drills after you formulate your plan, try to >> incorporate changes each time that will keep you thinking ahead. >> 3. Practice complete lab build ups and time yourself. My personal goal >> for my second attempt, other than passing, was to be done with the >> Infrastructure, QOS, and CME/CUE before lunch. I didnt register a single >> non-cme phone until about the 6th hour, but that was the way I planned >> it. >> 3. Read the whole test and look for dependencies. When you spot them, >> make a note of them. >> 4. You will more than likely run into some problems, write them down and >> move on. Don't get wrapped up in troubleshooting for more than a few >> minutes or else you will kill your time. Your lunch break is probably >> the best time to think about what could be wrong. >> 5. Watch the free IP Expert seminars for voice, there is some invaluable >> information in there. >> 6. Follow the SRND for your qos values when doing your calculations. >> There is a lot of contradictory information out there and I have even >> seen people on this board hand out advice on what they think it should >> be, which you will be wrong if you follow it. I scored perfect on the >> qos sections and I practiced my calculations based completely from the >> SRND values. Again, watch the videos on IP expert. >> >> >> Good luck. >> >> Craig >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sean >> hurricane >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:26 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >> >> >> >> My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have >> passed. i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i >> have most of the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from >> those who failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/06046ec9/attachment-0001.htm >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:51:49 -0400 >> From: sean hurricane <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >> To: Michael Ciarfello <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >> >> I don't believe i said anything about NDA, regarding IPCC, integration is >> not my problem and i can do most of the scripting, i am not just at a >> confident level where i can say scripting is a non-issue. if the script >> are >> as lengthy and difficult as ipexpert lab then i may struggle and just roll >> the dice on that portion of the lab. if not with lady luck on my side i >> should triumph. >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Michael Ciarfello >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > I have no nda stuff to share (either should anyone else) so no need for >> > private e-mail. >> > >> > >> > >> > Taken from my experience: If it?s your first time you will meet the >> > following: >> > >> > Unfamiliar with environment. Unfamiliar with the PC, can?t beat the >> > nervousness, the anxiety, the frustrations you will encounter, the >> > anxiousness?no matter how you say to yourself that you are ok. >> > >> > >> > >> > Remember you only have a 20 point margin. If you get IPCC questions and >> > they are worth 5-10-whatever points, your margin dropped by a LOT. >> > >> > >> > >> > You will encounter small problems on the test that didn?t happen during >> > your studies. These take time to fix (because you are an expert and >> know >> > how to fix them) but eat up your time. A lot of people say most people >> > don?t finish due to running out of time. I knew how to do EVERY >> question. >> > I didn?t have time to properly test everything?taking a lot of questions >> on >> > faith that they worked. I also couldn?t get things to work that I knew >> how >> > to do from customer experience and practiced in the lab many times and >> when >> > I got home and tried it, it also worked. Could have also been just >> mental >> > blocks. >> > >> > >> > >> > I?d say at the 5 hour mark, you better have a running tally of how many >> > points you think you have. If not over 80, you better work on the low >> > hanging fruit to try to get those points back. At the 6 hour mark, your >> > configurations are supposed to be complete and you test for 2 hours. If >> > your tally is not above 80, then you get into my situation of taking >> some >> > things on faith, testing others and resolving issues on others. >> > >> > >> > >> > You should know whether you passed or failed during the test. If you >> think >> > you got everything correct and you end up failing (which I?ve heard from >> > people,) then you were kidding yourself somewhere. You should know in >> your >> > configurations and your testing whether it worked or not. There are >> always >> > the points for ?what the proctor was looking for?, but I don?t think >> there >> > are 20 points worth of those. >> > >> > >> > >> > I wish you luck, but your statement ?but for the most part i have most >> of >> > the topic down cold? you will wish you never wrote. It will haunt you. >> And >> > I do believe some of the test is luck and things falling into place vs >> > giving trouble just to give trouble. Karma is huge. >> > >> > >> > >> > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *sean hurricane >> > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 12:29 PM >> > *To:* [email protected] >> > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB in five days >> > >> > >> > >> > my e-mail address is [email protected] if anyone wants to contact me >> > privately. >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, sean hurricane <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > My lab is in five days, any advice? especially from those who have >> passed. >> > i have some issues especially with IPCC but for the most part i have >> most of >> > the topic down cold. I will appreciate any advice even from those who >> > failed, at least i wont have to repeat their mistake. >> > >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090417/1b87b087/attachment-0001.htm >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:21 +1000 >> From: jeremy co <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >> To: Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> I have a prefix for it so why it didn't show up? >> >> gatekeeper >> zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 >> zone local CCM cisco.com >> no zone subnet CME default enable >> zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable >> no zone subnet CCM default enable >> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable >> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable >> zone prefix CME 2404.... >> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 >> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 >> zone prefix CCM 408* >> zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 >> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 >> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >> no shutdown >> >> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >> ========================= >> Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) >> Zone CCM master gateway list: >> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >> Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): >> Priority 9: >> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > They can overlap. It's okay for it to be that way as long as you have >> > zone prefixes defined. Or give it a different prefix....but you need >> one in >> > there for it to show up under that command. >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >> > *To:* marwa <[email protected]> >> > *Cc:* [email protected] >> > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 10:37 AM >> > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >> > >> > 1# is a default prefix for call manager, I added it already in CCM >> config >> > >> > >> > Jeremy >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, marwa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> hi, >> >> to see it add the tech prefix under the interface in cme >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> >> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >> >> *To:* Cliff McGlamry <[email protected]> ; Sergio Polizer< >> [email protected]> >> >> *Cc:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Arshad Dhunna< >> [email protected]>; >> >> [email protected] >> >> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:24 PM >> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> interface Loopback0 >> >> ip address 150.1.66.254 255.255.255.0 >> >> h323-gateway voip interface >> >> h323-gateway voip id CME ipaddr 150.1.64.114 1719 >> >> h323-gateway voip h323-id RS2 >> >> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 150.1.66.254 >> >> >> >> >> >> CME is registered. >> >> >> >> C2600#sh gatekeeper end >> >> GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION >> >> ================================ >> >> CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type >> >> Flags >> >> --------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- >> >> ----- >> >> 150.1.64.11 2059 150.1.64.11 3776 CCM VOIP-GW >> >> H323-ID: GK_Trunk_1 >> >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >> >> 150.1.66.254 1720 150.1.66.254 50245 CME VOIP-GW >> >> E164-ID: 6003 >> >> E164-ID: 6004 >> >> H323-ID: RS2 >> >> Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >> >> Total number of active registrations = 2 >> >> >> >> >> >> I made a call with dot configuration and it worked. >> >> ANy way why I cannot see CME under sh gatekeeper gw? >> >> >> >> Sergio I have them under gw interface >> >> >> >> >> >> Any idea? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Cliff McGlamry <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> Just because the dots show up doesn't mean they will work....but >> heck, >> >>> give it a try. We all might learn something. >> >>> >> >>> If CME won't register, what does the output of the show gateway >> command >> >>> on CME show? And please post the configuration of the interface where >> you >> >>> engaged the h323-gateway commands. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> *From:* jeremy co <[email protected]> >> >>> *To:* Marwa Ahmed <[email protected]> ; Cliff McGlamry< >> [email protected]>; Arshad >> >>> Dhunna <[email protected]> >> >>> *Cc:* [email protected] >> >>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 AM >> >>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> complete configuration is here: >> >>> SUB is not started though. >> >>> >> >>> gatekeeper >> >>> zone local CME cisco.com 150.1.64.114 >> >>> zone local CCM cisco.com >> >>> no zone subnet CME default enable >> >>> zone subnet CME 150.1.66.254/32 enable >> >>> no zone subnet CCM default enable >> >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.11/32 enable >> >>> zone subnet CCM 150.1.64.12/32 enable >> >>> zone prefix CME 2404.... >> >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 10 GK_Trunk_2 >> >>> zone prefix CCM 3... gw-priority 9 GK_Trunk_1 >> >>> zone prefix CCM 408* >> >>> zone prefix CME 5... gw-priority 10 RS2 >> >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >> >>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 0 GK_Trunk_1 GK_Trunk_2 >> >>> gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >> >>> no shutdown >> >>> >> >>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >> >>> ========================= >> >>> Prefix: 1#* (Default gateway-technology) >> >>> Zone CCM master gateway list: >> >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >> >>> Zone CCM prefix 3... priority gateway list(s): >> >>> Priority 9: >> >>> 150.1.64.11:3865 GK_1 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> configuration with dot style is working. like 3... instead of 3* >> >>> >> >>> but I cannot see CME under show gatekeeper gw command >> >>> >> >>> Any idea? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Jeremy >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Marwa Ahmed <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> is the cme registered? also do u have another local zone called CME >> >>>> other than CCM >> >>>> >> >>>> ------------------------------ >> >>>> *From:* [email protected] on behalf of jeremy >> co >> >>>> *Sent:* Thu 4/16/2009 7:55 PM >> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >> >>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper ,priority gw problem >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> I cannot make trunk prefix and GW priority showing up under "sh >> >>>> gatekeeper gw" >> >>>> >> >>>> zone local CCM cisco.com >> >>>> zone prefix CME 6... gw-priority 10 RS2 >> >>>> no shutdown >> >>>> >> >>>> GK#sh gatekeeper g >> >>>> GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >> >>>> ========================= >> >>>> >> >>>> I got nothing here >> >>>> >> >>>> any idea? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Jeremy >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090418/c70671de/attachment.htm >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCIE_Voice mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >> >> >> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 101 >> ******************************************* >> > >
