Thanks Anton for the your ideas. This is a big campus located in one big area so I think H-REAP is not a good way. I just put 1 WisM just to explain my question. I'm thinking to suggest this solution:
-To have 2 WisM and segregate the groups of users within the campus but still all data will be local on the core side. - - One other solution is to instead install standalone controllers to the distribution side so that the data processing will be local. But they have 15 big building and money will be the next problem. Haha!!! Do anybody have the same problem before because of too much users the wism breaks the 6500 some way? Having the same setup I just mentioned. -----Original Message----- From: Anton L. Vinokurov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 12:37 PM To: Manolo Encelan; [email protected] Subject: HA: Cisco Controllers vs Arouba Hi! One controller managind all your APs is definetely a bad design from the availability point of view (any vendor). You can set up WISM2 to manage APs in local mode (default), so all AP's and user traffic will traverse your (single) switch. Alternatively, you may configure your APs in "H-REAP" mode with local switching, so all management traffic will go via WISM, and user traffic will be switched locally (good for branch offices). Between a Cisco and Aruba controller, it is better to choose one you are more familiar with. If you are not familiar with any, better hire a good consultant. Regards, Anton. ________________________________________ От: [email protected] [[email protected]] от имени Manolo Encelan [[email protected]] Отправлено: 13 августа 2012 г. 12:55 Кому: [email protected] Тема: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Cisco Controllers vs Arouba Hi Guys, I know this is not the right group to ask this question but I would really appreciate if you could give some light on this issue. Cisco controllers vs Arouba: What's more better in terms of handling users data traffic? Network Information: - Network setup is Collapse Network. - 1 Wism2 controller inserted inside a 6500 core switch. - 500 AP manage by the Wism As to my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) that all data gathered by the APs will be process at the core switch while the Wism will just manage the APs and the users. And somewhere in the future this could break the 6500 switch :(. I've checked Arouba controller and I found out that all data processing are done not on the core switches but at distribution layer. One big point for Arouba. I'm I right? Thanks in advance. NholS _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
