Hi

than this is a bug :-(
Made a bug report :
http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-1449

let's see what we can do to solve it


with kind regards
Ruben Willems


On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:44 AM, madhu nambiar <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>       Cruise Control.NET 1.4.3.
>
>
> with regards
> Maddy
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ruben Willems <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> which version of CCNet are you using ?
>>
>> with kind regards
>> Ruben Willems
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Maddy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>      This is a doubt regarding the material published in the
>>> following link
>>>  "http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Integration
>>> +Queues"
>>>
>>>
>>> which tells that "The default behaviour of CruiseControl.Net is that
>>> each project defined in the configuration is given its own integration
>>> thread, thereby allowing differently named projects to build
>>> concurrently.
>>>
>>> Note however that a single project can never be building more than
>>> once at the same time. If you force a build on Project X while it is
>>> already integrating, that force build request is effectively blocked
>>> until the previous integration completes. So you can also think of
>>> this as each project having its own dedicated integration queue, where
>>> only the item at the head of the queue can be currently building, with
>>> at most one request pending."
>>>
>>> But this is really contradicting in my case as when i force my build
>>> it opens my IDE and starts the integration and building which takes
>>> about 3 min approx. but when i force my build in between the execution
>>> on my webdash board i see that it again opens another IDE and starts
>>> the building which is not acceptable.According to the link shown
>>> above,it should queue and wait for the 1st IDE execution to complete
>>> and then go for the 2nd one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can u plz suggest any solution to this problem??
>>>
>>> with kind regards
>>> Maddy
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to