Hi,
May i know who is going to fix that bug???Jst waiting for that to be
fixed.
with kind regards
Maddy
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ruben Willems <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> thanks for trying, so it is indeed a bug :-(
>
> with kind regards
> Ruben Willems
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:24 AM, madhu nambiar
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I jst tried out this below
>> <project name="NGFMS" queue="Q1" queuePriority="1">
>> But i dont see any change as it is invoking another IDE when the 1st IDE
>> is doing the building proccess.
>>
>> with kind regards
>> Maddy
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Ruben Willems <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> what you can try is the following :
>>> specify a queue name and priority on the project
>>> see
>>>
>>> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Project+Configuration+Block
>>>
>>>
>>> maybe that resolves the problem
>>> so the bug only manifests itself with a minimal project setup.
>>>
>>>
>>> with kind regards
>>> Ruben Willems
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM, madhu nambiar <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks ruben,I had pasted the ccnet.config initial part below
>>>>
>>>> <cruisecontrol>
>>>> <project name="VSAT">
>>>> <sourcecontrol type="filtered">
>>>> <sourceControlProvider type="filesystem">
>>>> <repositoryRoot>C:\MyProj</repositoryRoot>
>>>> <autoGetSource>true</autoGetSource>
>>>> <ignoreMissingRoot>false</ignoreMissingRoot>
>>>> </sourceControlProvider>
>>>> Do we need to specify anything else for the queinng integration to
>>>> work???
>>>>
>>>> with kind regards
>>>> Maddy
>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Ruben Willems <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> than this is a bug :-(
>>>>> Made a bug report :
>>>>> http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CCNET-1449
>>>>>
>>>>> let's see what we can do to solve it
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> with kind regards
>>>>> Ruben Willems
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:44 AM, madhu nambiar <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Cruise Control.NET 1.4.3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with regards
>>>>>> Maddy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ruben Willems <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which version of CCNet are you using ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with kind regards
>>>>>>> Ruben Willems
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Maddy <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi ,
>>>>>>>> This is a doubt regarding the material published in the
>>>>>>>> following link
>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Integration
>>>>>>>> +Queues"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which tells that "The default behaviour of CruiseControl.Net is that
>>>>>>>> each project defined in the configuration is given its own
>>>>>>>> integration
>>>>>>>> thread, thereby allowing differently named projects to build
>>>>>>>> concurrently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note however that a single project can never be building more than
>>>>>>>> once at the same time. If you force a build on Project X while it is
>>>>>>>> already integrating, that force build request is effectively blocked
>>>>>>>> until the previous integration completes. So you can also think of
>>>>>>>> this as each project having its own dedicated integration queue,
>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> only the item at the head of the queue can be currently building,
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> at most one request pending."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But this is really contradicting in my case as when i force my build
>>>>>>>> it opens my IDE and starts the integration and building which takes
>>>>>>>> about 3 min approx. but when i force my build in between the
>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>> on my webdash board i see that it again opens another IDE and starts
>>>>>>>> the building which is not acceptable.According to the link shown
>>>>>>>> above,it should queue and wait for the 1st IDE execution to complete
>>>>>>>> and then go for the 2nd one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can u plz suggest any solution to this problem??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with kind regards
>>>>>>>> Maddy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
