The table you give is of the refined cell dimensions. You really should rerun DENZO with the final refined values if they are very different from the initial ones.. The stop prediction in DENZO is based on the current cell dimensions, and it may be a little wrong if they change so much in SCALEPACK.

I believe the sca file retains the initial values which should be replaced, but check that from te scalepack log file.

;Eleanor


Alessio Accardi wrote:

Hi all,

I am very sorry if I have a somewhat trivial question, but I am quite new to the crystallography world. I process my data with Denzo followed by Scalepack and I noticed that the unit cell parameters in the scalepack .log file and in the final output *.sca file are different; not by much, at most around 1-1.5%.

This is the readout from the middle of the scalepack.log file:

Hkl's refined: 379123 N.Chi**2: 1.227 Decrease: 0.000 * 379123 = 0.5 Film # a b c alpha beta gamma crysz crysy crysx mosaicity 1 232.332 97.983 170.963 90.000 131.210 90.000 75.087 18.917 135.045 1.082 2 232.332 97.983 170.963 90.000 131.210 90.000 75.126 18.942 135.056 1.082 3 232.332 97.983 170.963 90.000 131.210 90.000 75.124 18.933 135.057 1.082 4 232.332 97.983 170.963 90.000 131.210 90.000 75.126 18.930 135.056 1.082 5 232.332 97.983 170.963 90.000 131.210 90.000 75.117 18.908 135.052 1.082

And this is the readout from the top of the output.sca file:

230.822 97.684 170.202 90.000 131.114 90.000 c2 First of all which of the two sets of values is the correct one to use in refinement? I would guess that the right one is the one in the .sca file as the hkl's and intensities refer to that unit cell, but I am not sure. Also, why are the values different? do they reflect different stages of refinement of the processed data? if so, is the one in the .sca file the more refined one?


Thank you

Alessio
Brandeis University




begin:vcard
fn:Eleanor  Dodson
n:Dodson;Eleanor 
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+44 (0) 1904 328259
tel;fax:+44 (0) 1904 328266
tel;home:+44 (0) 1904 424449
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to