Is this something new in refmac, or something undocumented (or am I looking in 
the wrong place by checking LABOUT)?



-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Kevin Cowtan
Sent: Tue 7/8/2008 4:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients
 
Yup, refmac too.

Pavel Afonine wrote:
> Not sure for other software, but in phenix.refine you can request to 
> output I*mFo-J*DFc map, where I and J are any user specified values.
> 
> Pavel.
> 
> 
> On 7/7/2008 6:00 PM, Meyer, Peter wrote:
>> It is redundant, but it adds an additional step if someone wanted to 
>> calculate something like a 3mFO-2DFc map.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Cowtan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Mon 7/7/2008 10:18 AM
>> To: Meyer, Peter
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients
>>  
>> Probably because in the classic implementation it is redundant, D 
>> being derived directly from sigmaa.
>>
>> Some programs refine D and sigmaa (or equivalent terms, such as 
>> Lunin's alpha and beta) separately. This is conceptually equivalent to 
>> deriving D from sigmaa and refining the scale between Fo and Fc 
>> simultaneously with sigmaa.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> Meyer, Peter wrote:
>>  
>>> Slightly off-topic from the original question, but is there a reason 
>>> that most programs don't output D for sigma_a coefficients?
>>>
>>> Pete
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Mayer, Mark (NIH/NICHD) [E]
>>> Sent: Sat 7/5/2008 2:39 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients
>>>  
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What do m and D indicate in the Fourier coefficients for a 2mFo-DFc map?
>>>
>>> I've dug a bit in web and CCP4 doc  but not found an explanation, 
>>> though I'm sure its there.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     
> 
> 

Reply via email to