it was there for some time. Info about this and some other new and not so new features can be found here:

http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/refmac/data/refmac_news.html


Some of the features like n mfo-l dfc map was there for 5.3 and may be even earlier.

regards
Garib



On 8 Jul 2008, at 19:39, Meyer, Peter wrote:

Is this something new in refmac, or something undocumented (or am I looking in the wrong place by checking LABOUT)?



-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Kevin Cowtan
Sent: Tue 7/8/2008 4:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients

Yup, refmac too.

Pavel Afonine wrote:
Not sure for other software, but in phenix.refine you can request to
output I*mFo-J*DFc map, where I and J are any user specified values.

Pavel.


On 7/7/2008 6:00 PM, Meyer, Peter wrote:
It is redundant, but it adds an additional step if someone wanted to
calculate something like a 3mFO-2DFc map.

Thanks,

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Cowtan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 7/7/2008 10:18 AM
To: Meyer, Peter
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients

Probably because in the classic implementation it is redundant, D
being derived directly from sigmaa.

Some programs refine D and sigmaa (or equivalent terms, such as
Lunin's alpha and beta) separately. This is conceptually equivalent to
deriving D from sigmaa and refining the scale between Fo and Fc
simultaneously with sigmaa.

Kevin


Meyer, Peter wrote:

Slightly off-topic from the original question, but is there a reason
that most programs don't output D for sigma_a coefficients?

Pete


-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Mayer, Mark (NIH/NICHD) [E]
Sent: Sat 7/5/2008 2:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Definition of Fourier coefficients

Hi,

What do m and D indicate in the Fourier coefficients for a 2mFo- DFc map?

I've dug a bit in web and CCP4 doc  but not found an explanation,
though I'm sure its there.

Thanks,

Mark









Reply via email to