Woops! Sorry in case I just confused a lot of people. The number Felix
reports: n_xtals = 0.078 means that the structure solution should have
been "easy" (I.E. it could have been done with a crystal having only 8%
of the volume used), and indeed it sounds like it was a slam dunk. So,
it sounds like Felix got a good prediction from it.
However, I am still very interested if anyone can solve a structure from
a case where my predictor says that you can't.
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
On 6/29/2010 4:18 PM, James Holton wrote:
On 6/29/2010 12:55 PM, Felix Frolow wrote:
BTW James Holton website calculate for this case 0.078 crystal
So far, every single one of these "reports" has come down to a
misinterpretation of the web interface. I am trying to make it
clearer, so I am interested in what values were entered into the
various fields when someone gets a result that they think is not
consistent with a real experiment that they did!
http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/xtalsize.html
BTW, this is a JavaScript program, so it runs on your web browser, not
my server. This means I am not spying on you, but it also means that
there is no way for me to tell what people are typing into it.
-James Holton
MAD Scientist
