Hello

I arrived at the p312 space group by running a self rotation function using
MOLREP. The maps show the space group as p312. I was scaling the data
individually for each wavelength. None of the three wavelengths are scaling
are scaling in p312 space group.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Clemens Vonrhein <vonrh...@globalphasing.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Deepthi wrote:
> > Hello everyone
> > I have a problem scaling the MAD data which was collected a week ago.The
> > data was collected at 1.5A resolution using three wavelengths for Zn-MAD
> > experiments. Scaling the data for MAD experiments, the number of
> rejections
> > and chi2 values were very high even after adjusting the error-scale
> factor
> > and error model. The space group i used was p312 which i obtained by
> > running a self-rotation function in MOLREP. When i scale my data using
> p312
> > spacegroup the chi2 and rejections were huge. But he data was scaling
> well
> > in p321 spacegroup. can anyone explain whats going on?
>
> When you say 'Scaling the data for MAD experiments': do you mean
> scaling the various scans for your 3-wvl MAD data in a single scaling
> job? Unless you already took care of this during data integration,
> remember that your separate scans could have been indexed differently
> and therefore don't match up. See eg.
>
>  http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/html/reindexing.html
>
> for some lookup-tables in P312 and P321. You can use the CCP4 program
> 'reindex' on MTZ files if needed.
>
> But I guess most modern data-processing and scaling programs will take
> care of that automatically anyway?
>
> Cheers
>
> Clemens
>
> --
>
> ***************************************************************
> * Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D.     vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
> *
> *  Global Phasing Ltd.
> *  Sheraton House, Castle Park
> *  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
> *--------------------------------------------------------------
> * BUSTER Development Group      (http://www.globalphasing.com)
> ***************************************************************
>



-- 
Deepthi

Reply via email to