-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nat,
isn't this partially discussed by Morris' and Bricogne's article about "Sheldrick's 1.2A rule and beyond" (Acta Cryst D59, 2003)? Tim On 05/09/12 20:44, Nat Echols wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Edward A. Berry > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Still I would expect to see peaks in a wilson plot around >> bond-length resolution, similar to the peaks due to secondary >> structure at lower resolution. > > I was curious about this myself, so I looked at the Wilson plot for > an atomic-resolution structure (attached). There is at best a > small hump around 1.5A; I suspect uncertainties in atomic positions > (i.e. the B-factor) reduce the effect. This was consistent in > several other atom-resolution datasets (of different proteins). > I'm curious what the bump around 2.25A is. > > -Nat - -- - -- Dr Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPqr14UxlJ7aRr7hoRAoEkAJ4+XvGEVGW8hQxBKmHvcd4cLiARoACcDH+4 bAfYYAPMdjvJpO8Q1lEV+Tg= =cy7M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
