Dear Haytham,
may I address your points (although some nice hints have already come
from previous replies)

1- if i have anomalous peak of unknown heavy atom, How can i identify
this heavy atom in general. (different methods)

To see anomalous peak I guess you have done the experiment at a
synchrotron (Cu and Zn do not show much anomalous if measured at home
sources). It is always good practice to run some fluorescence scan on
a new sample (say, a novel protein). This can be done at all tunable
beamlines (you might be able to have a broad scan of the entire range
of wavelength, such as an MCA scan first. Once you have found a region
of intrerest you can do a proper energy scan, exactly as if you were
looking for peak remote and inflection wavelengths for a MAD
experiment).
XANES (the proper absorption peak scan) and EXAFS are complementary
techniques. They can be performed in solution at dedicated beamlines
and they can provide precious information on the first and second
coordination spheres of the metal, but for the elemental recognition
it might be sufficient what you measure from your crystal.
Additional information can come from the coordination geometry of your
ion, as mentioned above.

2- in my case, i see anomalous peak in heavy atom binding site
(without any soaking). preliminary i did mass spec. i got Zn++ and Cu,
How can i know which one give the anomalous peak in my protein.

They might both give you anomalous signal... if you are working around
12.5 keV (near the Se edge), both metals have anomalous signal of 2-3
electrons... if you have only 1 heavy atom binding site you might
consider collecting anomalous at both the peak of Zn and Cu (9.7 and
9.0 keV approximately)... however this experiment would not be
necessary if you first find from an energy scan that only one is the
metal binding your protein. If you have a mixture of the two, your
final structure should take this into account (i.e. the appropriate
relative occupancies for the two ions)

3- there is way to know if i have Cu+ or Cu++.

Apart from the coordination geometry for the two oxidation states of
Copper, I know of people doing UV-Vis spectroscopy on the crystals
alongside their data collection. Micro-spectrophotometers are
available on demand at most (if not all) of the synchrotron sources.
If your species is radiation sensitive, a dose-dependent oxidation
could be monitored by collecting multiple spectra.


HTH

Best regards,

Marco

Reply via email to