Dear Ian, Herman, and others

 

What an active and responsive bulletin board!!  Thanks for the helpful
suggestions - it is going to take me some time to digest and then try to
implement something - but I will report back and let you know how I am
getting on.

Once again, thanks very much for the help!

 

Kind regards

 

James

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Ian Tickle
Sent: 13 March 2013 15:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Best practice for transformed PDB coordinates?

 

Herman,

Yes you are right.  I was assuming that since these are REMARKs then
programs would ignore them and use the space group in the CRYST1 record
to define the symmetry operators (a better way in my view, assuming that
the space group setting symbol is unambiguous as it should be).  If
programs are using the SYMTRY info then of course that would also need
to be updated.  This would be the same transformation as for the other
matrices, i.e. Ct = CoT^-1 where Co is the original SYMTRY matrix and Ct
is the new one for the transformed co-ords (again 4x4 matrices).

Cheers

-- Ian

 

On 13 March 2013 15:45, <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Ian,

 

My feeling is that most crystallograpic programs use indeed a separate
library with symmetry operators acting on fractional coordinates.
However, the SMTRY records in the PDB files work on the orthogonal
coordinates and some of the more advanced non-crystallographic
viewing/modeling programs use these to generate symmetry mates. In this
way, those non-crystallographic programs do not need to provide
libraries with symmetry operators and they do not need to bother whether
one has a hexagonal or rombohedral settings or whether the space group
is P21212 or P22121. If crystallographers would be using these records
as well, there would have been a lot less confusion, but that is another
story.

 

So to be on the safe side, one would need to either delete or transform
the SMTRY records.

 

Cheers,
Herman

 

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: Ian Tickle [mailto:[email protected]] 

        Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 4:22 PM
        To: Schreuder, Herman R&D/DE
        Cc: [email protected]

        
        Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Best practice for transformed PDB
coordinates?

         

         

         

        On 13 March 2013 14:51, <[email protected]> wrote:

         

        As I see it, there is no need to change the orthogonal
coordinates. They are used in connection with the SYMTRY records to
generate the symmetry mates. Changing the orthogonal coordinates would
mean changing the SYMTRY records, which would only complicate things. If
we do not change the orthogonal coordinates, we do not need to change
the SCALE matrix and the only thing we need to change is the ORIGX
matrix. 

         

        PS note there is no need to change the symmetry operators in
either scheme, because these actually operate on the fractional
co-ordinates, not directly on the orthogonal ones.  In my scheme I
redefine the SCALE matrix so that together with the transformed
co-ordinates you recover the original fractional co-ordinates and so the
symmetry still works correctly (theoretically of course!).
        
        Cheers

        -- Ian 

 


______________________________________________________________________
PLEASE READ: This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended 
for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the 
contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is 
unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender or [email protected]. Email is not a secure 
method of communication and the Company cannot accept responsibility for the 
accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please check 
this email for virus infection for which the Company accepts no responsibility. 
If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless 
otherwise stated, any views or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not represent those of the Company.

The Vernalis Group of Companies
100 Berkshire Place
Wharfedale Road
Winnersh, Berkshire
RG41 5RD, England
Tel: +44 (0)118 938 0000

To access trading company registration and address details, please go to the 
Vernalis website at www.vernalis.com and click on the "Company address and 
registration details" link at the bottom of the page..
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to