Sivaraj Ramesechan was outlining the physics of multiple wavelength anom 
scattering in the 1960s as a method for solving insulin. 
It was purely theoretical then; no instruments to make the measurements.. 
Eleanor

On 13 Mar 2013, at 17:19, Peter Moody wrote:

> When I started my PhD (in 1980!) at Imperial, David Blow already had a PhD 
> student who's project was to use the new Daresbury synchrotron to exploit 
> anomalous differences. Unfortunately it didn't  come on line in time for him 
> to actually get the data he needed. 
> I'd be intrigued to know who got the first structure from Daresbury. I don't 
> remember feeling there was a race at the time, but then we were a lot less 
> competitive in those days!
> Peter
> 
> On 13 March 2013 16:21, Colin Nave <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, this is a key paper demonstrating the possibilities.
> 
> The answer to the question of first structure solved is a bit more difficult. 
> Much of the early use of synchrotrons was for collecting high resolution data 
> for refinement to supplement data collected on lab sources. This included 
> data from similar structures with more or less sequence identity as well as 
> data from heavy atom derivatives. MAD structures appeared somewhat later (see 
> the references in Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 86, pp. 2190-2194, April 
> 1989 for some early examples).
> 
> Of course John Helliwell's book (Macromolecular Crystallography with 
> Synchrotron Radiation, chapter 10) gives a useful historical introduction.
> 
> Other than the above, if anyone has a claim to first structure solved just 
> with synchrotron radiation then they should speak up!
> 
> Colin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harry 
> Powell
> Sent: 13 March 2013 15:04
> To: ccp4bb
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] first use of synchrotron radiation in PX
> 
> Hi
> 
> Not sure if this is strictly speaking the first protein *solved* on a 
> synchrotron, but I think this is the first report of shooting protein 
> crystals at a synchrotron in the widely available literature -
> 
>         http://www.pnas.org/content/73/1/128.full.pdf+html
> 
>         Phillips J C, Wlodawer A, Yevitz M M and Hodgson K 0 1976 Proc. Nat. 
> Acad. Sci. USA 73 128-32
> 
>         Applications of synchrotron radiation to protein crystallography: 
> Preliminary results
> 
> 
> On 13 Mar 2013, at 14:38, Alan Cheung wrote:
> 
> > Hi all - i'm sure this many will know this : when and what was the first 
> > protein structure solved on a synchrotron?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Alan
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alan Cheung
> > Gene Center
> > Ludwig-Maximilians-University
> > Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25
> > 81377 Munich
> > Germany
> > Phone:  +49-89-2180-76845
> > Fax:  +49-89-2180-76999
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> 
> Harry
> --
> Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, 
> Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH Chairman of European 
> Crystallographic Association SIG9 (Crystallographic Computing)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
> privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If 
> you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the 
> addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, 
> copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the 
> e-mail.
> 
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
> necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> 
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any 
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any 
> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be 
> transmitted in or with the message.
> 
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
> Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
> Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to