The Excillum MetalJet (TM) source is technically very interesting, with
its liquid metal jet anode, but I have no idea how well it works for
typical in-house crystallography use.
On 04/30/13 15:00, Fareed Aboul-Ela wrote:
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a
core facility. The vendors are offering some new configurations.
Whatever the claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm hesitant to make a
decision without consulting someone with direct experience with them.
In particular, has anyone had any experience with using the
"photon100" CMOS detector being offered by Bruker, or the "pilatus
200K" detector being offered by Rigaku? I'd also appreciate hearing
from anyone with experience with the latest Bruker microfocus rotating
anode generator (called the Turbo or TXS)?
Many thanks for sharing your experiences.
Fareed Aboul-ela
Associate Professor
Zewail University
Zewail City of Science and Technology
Giza, Egypt
faboul...@zewailcity.edu.eg <mailto:faboul...@zewailcity.edu.eg>
--
=======================================================================
All Things Serve the Beam
=======================================================================
David J. Schuller
modern man in a post-modern world
MacCHESS, Cornell University
schul...@cornell.edu
