One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when investing in such expensive equipment is long-time reliability and quality of service in your place. Nothing is more frustrating than seeing your wonderful and expensive equipment standing idle for long periods because of lack of service. This may mean quite often taking compromises and going perhaps not for the front-line state-of-art piece of equipment but rather for the sturdy, hard-working equipment. It worked for us very well.

My 2p advice.

              Boaz

 
 
Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.                                        
Dept. of Life Sciences                                     
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev                         
Beer-Sheva 84105                                           
Israel                                                     
                                                           
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype: boaz.shaanan                 
Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710    
 
 
                


From: CCP4 bulletin board [[email protected]] on behalf of Fareed Aboul-Ela [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources

I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a core facility.  The vendors are offering some new configurations. Whatever the claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm hesitant to make a decision without consulting someone with direct experience with them.  In particular, has anyone had any experience with using the "photon100" CMOS detector being offered by Bruker, or the "pilatus 200K" detector being offered by Rigaku?  I'd also appreciate hearing from anyone with experience with the latest Bruker microfocus rotating anode generator (called the Turbo or TXS)?

Many thanks for sharing your experiences.

Fareed Aboul-ela
Associate Professor
Zewail University
Zewail City of Science and Technology
Giza, Egypt
[email protected]

Reply via email to