Phenix does even more, it adds TER after ions and ligands, so again manual 
messing is needed.
However they may have a jiffy to fix it.

FF

Dr Felix Frolow   
Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular 
Microbiology and Biotechnology
Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel

Acta Crystallographica F, co-editor

e-mail: [email protected]
Tel:  ++972-3640-8723
Fax: ++972-3640-9407
Cellular: 0547 459 608

On May 14, 2014, at 07:23 , Robbie Joosten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Felix,
> 
> I recently had the same problem. I didn't think TER records were a big deal. 
> I never had a program that did weird thing because of missing TER records. 
> But well, orders are orders, so we need TER records for deposition. It would 
> be nice if all refinement programs would write those. AFAIK, Phenix already 
> does.
> 
> Rather then putting them in manually, I ended up using pdb_extract to convert 
> my pdb file to mmCIF. A nice bonus is that you can throw in the log files 
> from indexing and phasing which saves a lot of typing later in the deposition 
> process.
> 
> Cheers,
> Robbie
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> Van: Felix Frolow
> Verzonden: 13-5-2014 23:26
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: [ccp4bb] TER in PDB file
> 
> Community!
> I am in the process of PDB deposition. 
> I have used for refinement Refmac.
> I enter to refinement cycle PDB file with TER separators.
> After refinement they disappear.
> PDB validation server (option 1 with geometrical parameters report ) DEMAND 
> TER separator.
> In my structure there are 28 hetero-mers.
> Is it sane:
>  To demand such thing?
> Not to supply  such thing?
> Do I miss something ?
> Does community punch in TER cards manually ?
> 
> FF
> 
> Dr Felix Frolow   
> Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular 
> Microbiology and Biotechnology
> Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel
> 
> Acta Crystallographica F, co-editor
> 
> e-mail: [email protected]
> Tel:  ++972-3640-8723
> Fax: ++972-3640-9407
> Cellular: 0547 459 608
> 

Reply via email to