Dear Alastair,

I think that refinement programs usually interpret chain ids A, B, ...
the way shelxl uses PART 1, 2, ... and a blank chain ID corresponds to
PART 0.
You may have to assign different residue numbers to CA and HOH, but I
think this is also the case for shelxl.

Does this resolve your problem?

Best,
Tim

On 05/14/2014 07:48 PM, Alastair Fyfe wrote:
> On the subject of  not (willfully) contaminating the pdb database, any
> suggestions on the following are appreciated. I am refining the solvent
> structure of some RNAs. Inspection of difference and anomalous
> difference maps suggests that some closely-spaced positions are
> alternately taken  by distinct entities with partial occupancy.  One
> pattern suggests partial occupancy by a Ca++ ion with a nearby site
> partially occupied by water (confirmed by an anomalous peak only for the
> former). I  am refining this with shelxl and expressing this in  the ins
> file is straightforward (and I'd like to express much gratitude for the
> multi-core version of shelxl!). However it's not clear to me how to say
> this in PDBese : choosing the HETATM residue name as either HOH or CA
> and assigning alternate positions with HOH and CA in the atom name field
> seems to make trouble for pdb reader software, eg mmdb.
> thanks,
> Alastair Fyfe
> 

-- 
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to