Hi Liuqing Chen

You have a lot of good suggestions, but everyone except for Janet has
missed out the most important suggestion, and Janet has called it something
funny - cross seeding often refers to something else.

You may well have a nucleation problem - that's to say many of your
screening experiments may be in the metastable zone of your protein's phase
diagram.

Try making a seedstock with your existing crystals and adding it to *random
*screens.  This can be combined with Janet's suggestions 2 (second part),
3, 4, 5, 7, 6 again, and 8.

For more information google MMS crystallization, or rMMS crystallization.

I hope it works - it very often does!

Good luck,

Patrick





On 4 June 2018 at 21:41, Janet Newman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Liuqing Chen,
>
> Everything that has been said seems reasonable, but there are always
> infinite possibilities in crystallisation, so it is more a question of
> priorities. Do the easy (or quick) things first. If you have buckets of
> prepared protein then what you will try first might be different than if
> you have to go and make your protein from scratch each time you set up
> crystal trays.
>
> 1. If you have crystals from an additive screen or seeding - try putting
> them in the beam. If you have access to in-plate screening, you can test
> the crystals without disturbing them, which will give the best idea of
> their native diffraction. Perhaps one of the ugly crystals diffracts well
> enough?
>
> 2. Try cross seeding - seed one or more initial screen(s) (rather than an
> optimisation).  Try initial screening with seeding at different
> temperatures. If you are currently using vapour diffusion, try microbatch.
> Or vice versa.
>
> 3. Try in-situ proteolysis. Add a very small amount of protease to your
> protein sample (chymotrypsin is traditional) - say 1:10,000 or 1:1000
> compared to your protein concentration then set up that mixture in initial
> screens.
>
> 4. Is there a ligand/inhibitor/other small molecule that binds? Add that
> to your protein before crystallisation. Maybe even try this first!
>
> 5. Lysine methylation/cysteine modification/other side chain modifications.
>
> 6. Try using DSF or some other technique to look at your protein's
> stability in the formulation it is in. Maybe you can make happier protein
> by changing the pH, buffer or salt.
>
> 7. If you want to be a little more rigorous, take your protein, and a
> number of different proteases, and do a time-course experiment with each
> protease (add 1:1000 protease to your protein, then take samples at
> timepoints - say 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 5 hours and overnight) then run out on
> a gel (or analyse by MS) and see if you come down to a stable fragment. If
> you do - then use that protease, and while you are waiting for the
> crystallisation trials to do their thing, find out what the end points of
> the proteolysis fragment are, and make that construct.
>
> 6. Try a different expression system (different tag, different position of
> the tag, cleave/don't cleave the tag). If the protein is produced in a
> eukaryotic system (and is glycosylated) try a different one to get
> different glycosylation pattern. Try kifunensine treated cells if you are
> in a mammalian expression system.
>
> 8. Try the same protein from other species
>
> Janet Newman
> Principal Scientist / Director, Collaborative Crystallisation Centre (C3)
> CSIRO Material Science and Engineering
> 343 Royal Parade
> Parkville.  VIC. 3052
> Australia
> Tel +613 9662 7326
> Email [email protected]
>
> ________________________________________
> From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> on behalf of Liuqing
> Chen <[email protected]>
> Sent: 04 June 2018 20:57
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ccp4bb] suggestion of crystallization optimization
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I get a crystal several months ago, but the crystals diffraction very low
> resolution (around 8A)  or no diffraction.
>   My sample buffer is 20mm Hepes ph7.0,  50mm NaCl,   my protein pI is 5.
>   the codition grow crytal  is : 30% PEG400, 100mm hepes 7.5,  200mm MgCl2.
>
> I also tried  additive screen,  all the crystals appear the same
> apparence,    even i seeding optimization,  have no improve.
> the  attach is  my crystals.
>
> what should   i  do next?
>
> thanks in advance.
> sincerely
> Liuqing chen
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>



-- 
 [email protected]    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to