Good suggestions here.  In situ proteolysis is a new one on me...

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Artem Evdokimov 
<artem.evdoki...@gmail.com> Date: 6/5/18  1:24 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: 
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] suggestion of crystallization 
optimization 
Janet, Patrick, and others beat me to it :)

We have tremendous luck with MMS in cases like this.
I would also suggest looking at 'atypical' additives - the word atypical is 
really not a good choice since the world of additives is pretty much infinite, 
but folks too often tend to take the lazy way out and use the few pre-compiled 
libraries of 'typical additives' that are available commercially. 
Not to mention that in cases like this a lot of improvement can be achieved by 
exploring protein concentration as a factor (not the same as drop ratio, that's 
also a lazy way out but it's not the same) and by switching buffers and salts 
to other buffers and salts (at the same pH even!). 
Crystals, protein crystals, with 8A diffraction - you're 65% done. The last 35% 
can take a year :)

Artem
- Cosmic Cats approve of this message

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Patrick Shaw Stewart <patr...@douglas.co.uk> 
wrote:

Hi Liuqing Chen
You have a lot of good suggestions, but everyone except for Janet has missed 
out the most important suggestion, and Janet has called it something funny - 
cross seeding often refers to something else.
You may well have a nucleation problem - that's to say many of your screening 
experiments may be in the metastable zone of your protein's phase diagram.
Try making a seedstock with your existing crystals and adding it to random 
screens.  This can be combined with Janet's suggestions 2 (second part), 3, 4, 
5, 7, 6 again, and 8.
For more information google MMS crystallization, or rMMS crystallization.
I hope it works - it very often does!
Good luck,
Patrick




On 4 June 2018 at 21:41, Janet Newman <janet.new...@csiro.au> wrote:
Liuqing Chen,



Everything that has been said seems reasonable, but there are always infinite 
possibilities in crystallisation, so it is more a question of priorities. Do 
the easy (or quick) things first. If you have buckets of prepared protein then 
what you will try first might be different than if you have to go and make your 
protein from scratch each time you set up crystal trays.



1. If you have crystals from an additive screen or seeding - try putting them 
in the beam. If you have access to in-plate screening, you can test the 
crystals without disturbing them, which will give the best idea of their native 
diffraction. Perhaps one of the ugly crystals diffracts well enough?



2. Try cross seeding - seed one or more initial screen(s) (rather than an 
optimisation).  Try initial screening with seeding at different temperatures. 
If you are currently using vapour diffusion, try microbatch. Or vice versa.



3. Try in-situ proteolysis. Add a very small amount of protease to your protein 
sample (chymotrypsin is traditional) - say 1:10,000 or 1:1000 compared to your 
protein concentration then set up that mixture in initial screens. 



4. Is there a ligand/inhibitor/other small molecule that binds? Add that to 
your protein before crystallisation. Maybe even try this first!



5. Lysine methylation/cysteine modification/other side chain modifications.



6. Try using DSF or some other technique to look at your protein's stability in 
the formulation it is in. Maybe you can make happier protein by changing the 
pH, buffer or salt.



7. If you want to be a little more rigorous, take your protein, and a number of 
different proteases, and do a time-course experiment with each protease (add 
1:1000 protease to your protein, then take samples at timepoints - say 0.5 
hours, 1 hour, 5 hours and overnight) then run out on a gel (or analyse by MS) 
and see if you come down to a stable fragment. If you do - then use that 
protease, and while you are waiting for the crystallisation trials to do their 
thing, find out what the end points of the proteolysis fragment are, and make 
that construct.



6. Try a different expression system (different tag, different position of the 
tag, cleave/don't cleave the tag). If the protein is produced in a eukaryotic 
system (and is glycosylated) try a different one to get different glycosylation 
pattern. Try kifunensine treated cells if you are in a mammalian expression 
system.



8. Try the same protein from other species



Janet Newman

Principal Scientist / Director, Collaborative Crystallisation Centre (C3)

CSIRO Material Science and Engineering

343 Royal Parade

Parkville.  VIC. 3052

Australia

Tel +613 9662 7326

Email janet.new...@csiro.au



________________________________________

From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Liuqing Chen 
<519198...@163.com>

Sent: 04 June 2018 20:57

To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Subject: [ccp4bb] suggestion of crystallization optimization



Hello everyone!



I get a crystal several months ago, but the crystals diffraction very low 
resolution (around 8A)  or no diffraction.

  My sample buffer is 20mm Hepes ph7.0,  50mm NaCl,   my protein pI is 5.

  the codition grow crytal  is : 30% PEG400, 100mm hepes 7.5,  200mm MgCl2.



I also tried  additive screen,  all the crystals appear the same apparence,    
even i seeding optimization,  have no improve.

the  attach is  my crystals.



what should   i  do next?



thanks in advance.

sincerely

Liuqing chen



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1




-- 
 patr...@douglas.co.uk    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36





To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1






To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to