Good thoughts, although there are always exceptions. For example, if a crystal 
contact is mediated by an extended domain that is capable of adopting multiple 
conformations (due to elbow motion, for example), then it may allow multiple 
crystal forms. It happens a lot in RNA crystals, but can also be found in 
protein crystals. 

From the user’s point of view, if crystal dehydration leads to space group 
change, it is a new crystal form. If the refinement does not kick off with 
routine fiddling of refinement parameters, it is equivalent to a new crystal 
form, because one has to go through the same procedure as to solve a new 
crystal form.  

Ailong

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 1:54 AM, Manfred S. Weiss 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear James,
> 
> let's spin the thought a bit further. What if there is a new program
> (Phaser-II) some day,
> for which the coordinates in your "new crystal form" are all of a sudden
> within the
> radius of convergence again? Does this bring your "new crystal form"
> back to the old
> crystal form again?
> 
> I'd say it is neither cell dimensions nor space group that define a new
> crystal form. It
> is the packing of the molecules. It happens quite often in dehydration
> experiments
> that molecules in a lattice move a bit and symmetry elements are lost or
> new symmetry
> elements are created. The space group changes, as well as the unit cell
> dimensions. But
> the packing remains essentially the same. You can usually infer what
> happens, but you
> still need molecular replacement to actually solve the "new" form.
> 
> Best, Manfred
> 
> 
> Am 09.12.2020 um 01:56 schrieb James Holton:
>> I have a semantics question, and I know how much this forum loves
>> discussing semantics.
>> 
>> We've all experienced non-isomorphism, where two crystals, perhaps
>> even grown from the same drop, yield different data. Different enough
>> so that merging them makes your overall data quality worse. I'd say
>> that is a fairly reasonable definition of non-isomorphism? Most of the
>> time unit cell changes are telling, but in the end it is the I/sigma
>> and resolution limit that we care about the most.
>> 
>> Now, of course, even for non-isomorphous data sets you can usually
>> "solve" the non-isomorphous data without actually doing molecular
>> replacement.  All you usually need to do is run pointless using the
>> PDB file from the first crystal as a reference, and it will re-index
>> the data to match the model.  Then you just do a few cycles of rigid
>> body and you're off and running.  A nice side-effect of this is that
>> all your PDB files will line up when you load them into coot.  No
>> worries about indexing ambiguities, space group assignment, or origin
>> choice. Phaser is a great program, but you don't have to run it on
>> everything.
>> 
>> My question is: what about when you DO have to run Phaser to solve
>> that other crystal from the same drop?  What if the space group is the
>> same, the unit cell is kinda-sorta the same, but the coordinates have
>> moved enough so as to be outside the radius of convergence of
>> rigid-body refinement?  Does that qualify as a different "crystal
>> form" or different "crystal habit"?  Or is it the same form, and just
>> really non-isomorphous?
>> 
>> Opinions?
>> 
>> -James Holton
>> MAD Scientist
>> 
>> ########################################################################
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>> 
>> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
>> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
>> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
> 
> --
> Dr. Manfred S. Weiss
> Macromolecular Crystallography
> Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin
> Albert-Einstein-Str. 15
> D-12489 Berlin
> Germany
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH
> 
> Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren 
> e.V.
> 
> Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Volkmar Dietz, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta 
> Koch-Unterseher
> Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (Sprecher), Prof. Dr. Jan Lüning, 
> Thomas Frederking
> 
> Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583
> 
> Postadresse:
> Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1
> D-14109 Berlin
> 
> ########################################################################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing 
> list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to