> The whole "foo via cctalk" is *really* annoying... What is wrong with > a half default mailman setup? There is no Reply-To header there, From > is set to the person actually sending the message (as it should be).
Yes, that is most annoying. My complaint (and I guess many more from other users will follow) is, that if you reply to a message on the list, the author of that message gets a private mail, too, as he is listed in the Reply-To:-field. This is *wrong* and must be corrected (i.e. removed)! (BTW this reply to Alfed's mail is to one sent to me privately because of that error). Indeed, the Reply-To header should be nuked. > And all the bounce addresses are set to > [email protected] where foo=bar is the user > sending the message. No, the Envelope-From: only has "[email protected]", there's no "+foo=bar" in it. And yes, the change in the address fields don't cure the bounce problem because the envelope from field is unchanged (and *that* field is used for bounces, not the header fields *within* the mail). I meant that it should have the +foo=bar thing in it, the example I was showing was how it _should_ look like, not what it currently looks like. Was a bit unclear there I suppose.
