>
> Windows 2003 and XP is about as obsolete now as the IBM PC was in 1995.
> Probably more so. XP is popular on Vogons but I'm sure considerably less
> then 5% of computers actually host it.
>
> There's also the issue of beating a dead horse. There will always and
> forever (and forever...) be some esoteric issue to discuss about some
> bizzare and mostly unknown 8 bit system that 3 people on the whole of
> planet earth own (now not to brag, but chances are there are a dozen or
> less Northstar Dimension owners (never mind users) out there. And I'm
> proud to be 1). Who am I going to discuss that with?? And a larger issue
> is what? An even larger issue is why? Well I got plans ...
> 
> Lists of this sort are about tech and used by people who love it. Windows
> 11 is not germain to these conversations. But what about, and I'm just
> putting this out there, making pre UEFI shtuff -on-? I don't even know
> how I personally feel about such a delineation. But the suggestion is
> there. Nostalgic weirdos like older tech. Yes often dang old. Now a
> Thinkpad T60p doesn't exactly seem dang old. But it's pretty much dang
> obsolete (can't remember what sort of firmware it has but the processor,
> though 64 bit, is part of that hazy quasi transitional grouping that had
> more similarities to a 32 bit chip).     On Tuesday, December 20, 2022,
> 10:05:06 PM EST, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:  
> 
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Chris via cctalk wrote:
>> Well there doesn't seem to be a great deal of activity these days, I has 
>> thought the suggestion about relaxing the rules might need discussing.
>> I know there are people still using Windows 2003 puters, or a near 
>> equivalent based on XP? But that's entirely irrelevant, as I'm quite 
>> sure you could find someone out there still utilizing an 8088/286/386. 
>> Of course that's the discretion of the sysop. As it stands there's at 
>> least 1 opinion for every ahole attached to the person who types on this 
>> board. Whateber. The way I see it dang obsolete shouldd be open for 
>> discussion.
>
> To summarize:  "On-Topic" == "Dang obsolete"
>


It seems that the previous list owner lost interest in this mailing list
and turfed us over to someone else who doesn't really say anything some
time ago.  At least I think that's what happened.  Nobody really said
anything.

So, can someone enlighten me on how to stop receiving mail from the list
until the holidays and/or this discussion are over under the new regime?

Regards,
Peter Coghlan

Reply via email to