The Doctor wrote: > ste...@malikoff.com wrote: >> If you believe you can bandsaw the roll to a tape width of the >> nominal 1.000" and that any deviation in that width is less than the >> code holes 0.002" transverse allowance as defined in the ANSI >> X3.18-1967 Standard then you have either a really nice bandsaw and a >> well-made cutting jig or very very steady hand. > > I was not making a passive-aggressive suggestion. > (thank you for the reference, by the bye)
There's also an ECMA standard for punched tape, that I believe has the same specifications as the ANSI standard, and is available for free in case the ANSI document isn't. https://ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-10/ It has been put in category "Withdrawn", how's that for passive agressive? If 1970 feels too fresh, there's this: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ecma/ECMA-10_1st_Edition_November_1965.pdf
