I too have watched this thread.

The choices if you are lucky enough to have the hardware, are

(1)  Run the software - enjoy it - understand that its unlikely that the
ghost of DEC (Whatever that is) will pay any attention.

(2) Obey DECs commercial wishes and drill a 1/2"hole through the silicon in
each individual board on the backplane, and physically mail them one at a
time to the haters in this group to demonstrate that you have obeyed the
licencing laws explicitly.

Easy :-)
.

Kindest regards,

Doug Jackson

em: [email protected]
ph: 0414 986878




On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 18:38, Rod Smallwood via cctalk <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 28/11/2025 04:10, Chris Hanson via cctalk wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2025, at 9:45 AM, Peter Ekstrom via cctalk<
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> Ok, so there basically isn't a truly legit and ethical way to run it
> as a
> >> hobbyist.
> > There is not a legal way to run it unless you acquired a perpetual
> license to run it on that system before DEC/Compaq/HP stopped selling such
> licenses.
> >
> > Whether it is *moral* or *ethical* to run it is independent of whether
> it is *legal* to run it, and a poor analogy such as one likening running it
> to stealing a car will not help much in making up your own mind about such
> things.
> >
> >    — Chris
>
> > I worked for DEC for 10 years. They were the best company I ever worked
> for or with
> > They were altruistic, kind and generous.  They loaned out hardware and
> > software all the time.
>
>      I am English and to an extent therefore somewhat can claim to have
> an indpendant view.
>
>      Here I will make a non-detrimental comment.
>
>     The US is dollar driven and uses its laws for business advantage
> when it can.
>
>      The most famous British judge Lord Denning always said.
>
>      "This is not a court of law but a place of justice, fairness and
> truth"
>
>       DEC has (sadly) been gone for 25 years.
>
>       So running old VMS versions on old VAX systems for non-profit
> personal interest should be fair use.
>
> Rod Smallwood
>
>

Reply via email to