On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Pascal Stumpf <pascal.stu...@cubes.de> wrote:
> xterm has not deleted support for utmp in favour of utmpx. It checks in > ./configure. What speaks against implementing it in a similar fashion in dtterm? BTW: Is there a better reason than "It's evil because it comes from SVR4" why utmpx hasn't been implemented in OpenBSD yet? I remember back in 2010 this was the only argument(1) from the OpenBSD guys. Kind regards, Martin Etteldorf (1): "It's SVR4 crap inherited when X/Open and POSIX were merged into the same standard." -- Mark Kettenis on the openbsd-tech mailinglist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
