Nina Jeliazkova wrote: > Rajarshi Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> However all this is only relevant when the property is equal to the >> actual parent object - for components of a parent object I don't see >> that this is a problem. This observation could be used to simplify > > This is not quite correct. The original case I've found yesterday was a > property of type RingSet, assigned to an Atom. The RingSet contains set of > Atoms, including the Atom itself.
Very good example. Egon and Stefan wrote: >> I cannot remember why I (commit rev 3087) added the cloning of >> > IChemObjects, and would actually propose to not clone these >> > properties. > So do I. I second this. Dropping the possibility to store IChemObject properties is not an option, for the above reason. So not cloning them is the best way out. Cheers, Chris -- Dr. rer. nat. habil. Christoph Steinbeck Steinbeck Molecular Informatics Franz-John-Str. 10, 77855 Achern, Germany Phone: +49-177-8236510 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise. ... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
