On Nov 29, 2007 2:21 PM, Christoph Steinbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Egon and Stefan wrote: > >> I cannot remember why I (commit rev 3087) added the cloning of > >> > IChemObjects, and would actually propose to not clone these > >> > properties. > > So do I. > > I second this. Dropping the possibility to store IChemObject properties > is not an option, for the above reason. > So not cloning them is the best way out.
OK, option 2: not cloning. Egon -- ---- http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
