On 6 July 2011 14:42, Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi.g...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I like Jules suggestions - use Java exceptions where possible/
> reasonable, but have a hierarchy of CDKExceptions; my worry is that it
> will be easy to have a proliferation of CDKException subclasses, such
> that rather than throw an appropriate class, code will just throw the
> most generic exception. if we do go for a hierarchy, I would suggest
> to keep it as lean as possible
>

Hundreds of descendant of the top CDKException class doesn't sound good
indeed.

One idea is to have first level of sub-classes restricted for one per
package/module. The subsequent levels will depend on what is needed inside
the module.

Regards,
Nina

>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>
> > Hi developers *and* users,
> >
> > shall we try to come up with a good Exception design for master?
> >
> > Currently, the CDK uses a mix of various CDK specific exceptions,
> > though we officially promote the single use of CDKException. Others
> > have requested to use more general exceptions, like
> > IllegalArgumentException.
> >
> > Today, another user problem came up, a NPE upon missing 2D coordinates
> > in the renderer, where in fact a IllegalArgumentException may be
> > appropriate, with a good error message.
> >
> > I like to discuss this issue, and in particular these three designs:
> >
> > 1. Only CDKException with proper messages (current formal design of
> > the CDK, which several classes violate)
> > 2. Use CDK-specific, tuned exceptions, such as NoSuchAtomTypeException
> > (existing already) and Missing2DCoordinatesException
> > 3. Use Java Exceptions only, like IllegalArgumentException with
> > proper messages
> >
> > There are pros and cons for all of them. Let's try to get them clear
> > first.
> >
> > Egon
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr E.L. Willighagen
> > Postdoctoral Researcher
> > Institutet för miljömedicin
> > Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
> > Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
> > Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> > PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> > valuable.
> > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> > security
> > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> > makes
> > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cdk-devel mailing list
> > cdk-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Rajarshi Guha        | NIH Chemical Genomics Center
> http://www.rguha.net | http://ncgc.nih.gov
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Finally I am becoming stupider no more
>   - Paul Erdos' epitaph
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Cdk-devel mailing list
> cdk-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user

Reply via email to