On 1 Nov, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>On 19 Oct, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> And ethical consideration should tell you that as long as I cannot prvent >>> companies like Ahead to steal my tecnology, the best idea is not >>> to give away the real omportant parts in source. > >>Are you implying that Ahead did steal your technology, or that they >>might do that in the future? If it's the latter, what makes you think >>so? > > Although it seems that you are the only person who did not understand the text > as it has been intended (I believe this because the text already is clear, all > other people did understand it as it has been intended), So "all other" people have told you that they understood your sentence as it was intended? I am not surprised no one else here has bothered about writing to you about this sideswipe against a commercial company, but I am quite sure that some have wondered why you mentioned Ahead and not some other company. Disclaimer: as Joerg might remember I have worked for Ahead and found them to be a very hard-working, honest lot. I only left them to work in a Unix environment again elsewhere. > I give you an explanation: > > I used the name "Ahead" as an example of a name of a company from the CD-R > software branch. I could have used "Goldenhawk", "Roxio" or any other company > name without changing the message. If you read my text correctly you will see > that I did not call "Adead" a company that actually steals my technology. I never said that. I only wanted to get the clarification that nothing like that was implied implicitly. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MakeCD related mails) http://home.pages.de/~Ohly/ http://makecd.core.de/ (MakeCD home page)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
