bugs/suggestions for 0.1rc3 (Fedora Core 5 i386): - still getting the rename dialog every time I right click on a model in the model tree unless I specifically choose an option or move the mouse away from the pop-up menu. Similarly, a right click in the graph window will always result in a zoom out unless zoom full is specifically highlighted or the mouse is moved away from the pop-up menu.
- once I have loaded several models and run the integrations, it is slow to swap between models in the model tree. Given that all the models have been run and have results, they can not be altered at all so there should be no code generation going on at all. So does this confirm that the RDF generation to make the variable list display is slowing down the interface? - and to follow on from above, when I select a different model in the model tree, the model is highlighted immediately which to me indicates that the model has been successfully selected and I can continue my work. However, due to the time taken to update the rest of the interface I still have to wait before I can do anything. Would be nice if the selected model highlighting didn't happen until after everything was ready for me to work with the selected model. Maybe unhighlight the previous model but don't highlight the newly selected model until everything is ready. - by default there is no visible pane/window/whatever for the traces in a graph. When I click "New" (which maybe should be relabelled "New Trace"?) nothing apparently happens....I have to resize the traces pane to be able to see that I have been adding traces to the graph. - If I drag out the two graphing panes, I get to a pane that has a Voltage VS Current tab - not sure what that is supposed to offer? Seems any IV plots can already be done in the current graphs... - is there a better way to choose variables for graphing? In a reasonably complex model it is a real pain to scroll up and down the component list and then choosing the right variable. Something where I could start typing in variable names (ID's?) and have a completion list of matching variables pop-up would be useful for me. - and it would still be nice to have some other way to specify the number of points in a graph than the point density. - and a very minor issue, possibly due to the use of the max subscript on the point density text label, all the labels (and units) in the integrator settings pane are not quite aligned with the text boxes... Andre. Andrew Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > The third release candidate for PCEnv, version 0.1, has been > released. Information about the released files is available at: > http://www.cellml.org/tools/pcenv/pcenv-releases/physiome-cellml-environment/releases/0.1rc3 > > > > This release candidate has been designed so it will work with the > recent xpcellml_api 1.0 release candidate (xpcellml_api 1.0rc2). If you > are interested in using PCEnv 0.1, please test this release candidate to > ensure there are no problems with it. > > Once a reasonable amount of time has elapsed, and no problems with the > release candidate are identified, PCEnv will be released. Please > report any bugs you find at http://www.cellml.org/tools/pcenv/tracker, > or to this list, or directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Best regards, > Andrew Miller > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
