Dear all Just as we did with the transition from CellML 1.0 to 1.1 through the introduction import capabilities, we are keen to further improve the structure and expressiveness of CellML. To this end we would like to start a process of considering proposals for the specification of future versions of CellML. A number of suggestions for improving the CellML specification have already been informally discussed by members of the CellML community (e.g. the addition of variable typing capabilities, modification of the import element to avoid ambiguities, extending or removing the 'CellML subset' of content MathML). We are currently trying to establish tools to facilitate the community-wide process of proposing, evaluating, and deciding how the CellML language can evolve. Our first step is to establish a workflow to handle the evolution of the specification. Once this is achieved, we can receive proposals and start the process of critiquing and deciding what to include in future specifications. I would like to invite everyone within the CellML community to contribute to this process by participating in the CellML discussion list debates.
Best wishes Poul _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
