Frankly gentlemen, I think that the
Muslims could stand to send ambassadors to the Christians. Hopefully
one that doesn't scream "death to the infidels!!" on a consistent
basis.
David
ORourke54.htm
"There
is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and
there is no virtue in advocating it. A politician who portrays himself
as
"caring" and "sensitive" because he wants to expand the
government's charitable programs is merely saying that he's willing to
try to
do good with other people's money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who
takes pride
in supporting such programs is telling us that he'll do good with his
own money
-- if a gun is held to his head."--P.
J. O'Rourke
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Billy,
On Jun 27, 2009, at 10:18 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Seems to me that this new system simply
never struck Obama as unjust
or unfair --because he is, in fact, pro-Muslim. I don't see where
some other conclusion is the least tenable.
My humble opinion
Are we facing any life-threatening PR problems with the Hindu world?
Do we have major Catholic nations supporting terrorists who are trying
to kill us?
How many Buddhists think America is out to destroy Buddhism?
Like it or not, we have a major Muslim problem in the world. You may
not want us to make peace with Muslim nations, but given that most
Americans think that's a good idea, trying to get on their good side
seems a logical step.
-- Ernie P.
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
|
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
