Yup, 10694 is a known bug in dumpling which we probably don't want to fix. The rados tests look ok to me I think. -Sam
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Yuri Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I updated all issues in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 > > Based on what is listed there, we have > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10801 - Yehuda pls comment > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Sam pls re-confirm > > rbd - Josh, I understood that we are good to go, pls re-confirm. > > I can re-run some suites if you'd like and we can make a call on this release. > > Loic - back to you, let me know what you think. > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <[email protected]> > To: "Yuri Weinstein" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <[email protected]>, "Sage Weil" > <[email protected]>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <[email protected]>, "Zack Cerza" > <[email protected]>, "Sandon Van Ness" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 2:17:49 PM > Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE > > > > On 12/02/2015 23:06, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >> I linked all issues related to this release testing to the ticket >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 >> >> After the team leads make a call of those, including environment issues, I >> suggest re-running suites the failed again. >> >> Loic, I'd re-run them in the Octo, since we already started there, if you >> agree ? > > Sure :-) > >> >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Yuri Weinstein" <[email protected]> >> To: "Loic Dachary" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Ceph Development" <[email protected]>, "Sage Weil" >> <[email protected]>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:24:33 PM >> Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE >> >> I replied to individual suites runs, but just wanted to summarize QE >> validation status. >> >> The following suites were executed in the Octo lab (we will use Sepia in the >> future if nobody objects). >> >> upgrade:dumpling >> ================ >> ['45493'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Known "Won't fix" >> "Assertion: osd/Watch.cc: 290: FAILED assert(!cb)" >> >> *** Sam - pls confirm the "Won't fix" status. >> >> ['45495', '45496', '45498', '45499', '45500'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10838 >> "s3tests failed" >> >> *** Yehuda - need your verdict on s3tests. >> >> fs >> ================ >> All green ! >> >> rados >> ================ >> ['45054'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10841 >> "Issued certificate has expired" >> *** Sandon pls comment. >> >> ['45168', '45169'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10840 >> coredump "ceph_test_filestore_idempotent_sequence" >> *** Sam - pls comment >> >> ['45215'] >> Missing packages - no ticket FYI >> "Failed to fetch >> http://apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages >> Hash Sum mismatch" >> >> *** Zack, Sandon ? >> >> ceph-deploy >> ================ >> >> Travis - pls suggest >> In general I am not sure if we needed to test this - Sage? >> >> rbd >> ================ >> ['45365', '45366', '45367'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10842 >> "unable to connect to apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com" >> >> ['45349', '45350', '45351', '45355', '45356', '45357', '45363'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10802 >> "error: image still has watchers" >> (duplicate of 10680) >> >> *** Zack, Sandon, Josh - all environment noise, pls comment. >> >> rgw >> ================ >> ['45382', '45390'] >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10843 >> "s3tests failed" - could be related or duplicate of 10838 >> >> *** Yehuda - same as issues in upgrades? >> >> I am standing by for you analysis/replies and recommendations for next steps. >> >> Loic - let me know is you want to follow specific items in our backport >> testing process that I missed here. >> PS: I would think that you could've wanted to assign the release ticket to >> QE (me) for validation and at this point I could've re-assigned it back to >> devel (you), a? >> >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loic Dachary" <[email protected]> >> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Ceph Development" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM >> Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE >> >> Hi Yuri, >> >> The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by >> Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. >> >> For the record, the head is >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410 >> >> I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports. The >> alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. However, >> since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it probably is >> better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch itself. As it >> is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpling branch that >> should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not belong to v0.67.11 >> and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future though, the dumpling >> branch will only receive commits that have been carefully tested and all the >> integration work will be on the dumpling-backports branch exclusively. So >> that third parties do not have to worry that the dumpling branch contains >> commits that have not been tested yet. >> >> Cheers >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
