All issues in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 updated.
Loic - #10801 can be resolved. v0.67.12 ready for release. Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com> To: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Sage Weil" <s...@redhat.com>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <tmuth...@redhat.com>, "Zack Cerza" <z...@redhat.com>, "Sandon Van Ness" <svann...@redhat.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:38:19 AM Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE Hi all I updated all issues in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 Based on what is listed there, we have http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10801 - Yehuda pls comment http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Sam pls re-confirm rbd - Josh, I understood that we are good to go, pls re-confirm. I can re-run some suites if you'd like and we can make a call on this release. Loic - back to you, let me know what you think. Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Sage Weil" <s...@redhat.com>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <tmuth...@redhat.com>, "Zack Cerza" <z...@redhat.com>, "Sandon Van Ness" <svann...@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 2:17:49 PM Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE On 12/02/2015 23:06, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > I linked all issues related to this release testing to the ticket > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 > > After the team leads make a call of those, including environment issues, I > suggest re-running suites the failed again. > > Loic, I'd re-run them in the Octo, since we already started there, if you > agree ? Sure :-) > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com> > To: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Sage Weil" > <s...@redhat.com>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <tmuth...@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:24:33 PM > Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE > > I replied to individual suites runs, but just wanted to summarize QE > validation status. > > The following suites were executed in the Octo lab (we will use Sepia in the > future if nobody objects). > > upgrade:dumpling > ================ > ['45493'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Known "Won't fix" > "Assertion: osd/Watch.cc: 290: FAILED assert(!cb)" > > *** Sam - pls confirm the "Won't fix" status. > > ['45495', '45496', '45498', '45499', '45500'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10838 > "s3tests failed" > > *** Yehuda - need your verdict on s3tests. > > fs > ================ > All green ! > > rados > ================ > ['45054'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10841 > "Issued certificate has expired" > *** Sandon pls comment. > > ['45168', '45169'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10840 > coredump "ceph_test_filestore_idempotent_sequence" > *** Sam - pls comment > > ['45215'] > Missing packages - no ticket FYI > "Failed to fetch > http://apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages > Hash Sum mismatch" > > *** Zack, Sandon ? > > ceph-deploy > ================ > > Travis - pls suggest > In general I am not sure if we needed to test this - Sage? > > rbd > ================ > ['45365', '45366', '45367'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10842 > "unable to connect to apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com" > > ['45349', '45350', '45351', '45355', '45356', '45357', '45363'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10802 > "error: image still has watchers" > (duplicate of 10680) > > *** Zack, Sandon, Josh - all environment noise, pls comment. > > rgw > ================ > ['45382', '45390'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10843 > "s3tests failed" - could be related or duplicate of 10838 > > *** Yehuda - same as issues in upgrades? > > I am standing by for you analysis/replies and recommendations for next steps. > > Loic - let me know is you want to follow specific items in our backport > testing process that I missed here. > PS: I would think that you could've wanted to assign the release ticket to > QE (me) for validation and at this point I could've re-assigned it back to > devel (you), a? > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org> > To: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM > Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE > > Hi Yuri, > > The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by > Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. > > For the record, the head is > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410 > > I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports. The > alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. However, > since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it probably is > better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch itself. As it > is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpling branch that > should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not belong to v0.67.11 > and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future though, the dumpling > branch will only receive commits that have been carefully tested and all the > integration work will be on the dumpling-backports branch exclusively. So > that third parties do not have to worry that the dumpling branch contains > commits that have not been tested yet. > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
