Please see the comment below:

2015-08-05 0:13 GMT+08:00 Somnath Roy <somnath....@sandisk.com>:
> Yes, it has to re-acquire pg_lock today..
> But, between journal write and initiating the ondisk ack, there is one 
> context switche in the code path. So, I guess the pg_lock is not the only one 
> that is causing this 1 ms delay...
> Not sure increasing the finisher threads will help in the pg_lock case as it 
> will be more or less serialized by this pg_lock..
My concern is, if pg lock of pg A has been grabbed, not only ondisk
callback of pg A is delayed, since ondisk_finisher has only one
thread,  ondisk callback of other pgs will be delayed too.
> But, increasing finisher threads for the other context switches I was talking 
> about (see queue_completion_thru) may help...
We also count that latency, and It doesn't took much time in our case.

2015-08-05 0:13 GMT+08:00 Somnath Roy <somnath....@sandisk.com>:
> Yes, it has to re-acquire pg_lock today..
> But, between journal write and initiating the ondisk ack, there is one 
> context switche in the code path. So, I guess the pg_lock is not the only one 
> that is causing this 1 ms delay...
> Not sure increasing the finisher threads will help in the pg_lock case as it 
> will be more or less serialized by this pg_lock..
> But, increasing finisher threads for the other context switches I was talking 
> about (see queue_completion_thru) may help...
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Somnath
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
> [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ding Dinghua
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 3:00 AM
> To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: More ondisk_finisher thread?
>
> Hi:
>    Now we are doing some ceph performance tuning work, our setup has ten ceph 
> nodes, and SSD as journal, HDD for filestore, and ceph version is 0.80.9.
>    We run fio in virtual maching with random 4KB write workload, we find that 
> It took about 1ms in average for ondisk_finisher, while journal write only 
> took 0.4ms, so I think it's unreasonable.
>     Since ondisk callback will be called with pg lock held, If pg lock has 
> been grabbed by another thread(for example, osd->op_wq), all ondisk callback 
> will be delayed, then all write op will be delayed.
>      I found that op_commit must be called with pg lock, so what about 
> increase the ondisk_finisher thread number, so ondisk callback can be less 
> likely to be delayed.
>
> --
> Ding Dinghua
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the 
> body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> ________________________________
>
> PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
> intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that you have received this message in error and that any review, 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
> the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy 
> any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or 
> electronically stored copies).
>



-- 
Ding Dinghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to