It's interesting to see ondisk_finisher will occur 1ms, could you replay this workload and see whether exists read io from iostat. I guess it may help to see the cause.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Somnath Roy <somnath....@sandisk.com> wrote: > Yes, it has to re-acquire pg_lock today.. > But, between journal write and initiating the ondisk ack, there is one > context switche in the code path. So, I guess the pg_lock is not the only one > that is causing this 1 ms delay... > Not sure increasing the finisher threads will help in the pg_lock case as it > will be more or less serialized by this pg_lock.. > But, increasing finisher threads for the other context switches I was talking > about (see queue_completion_thru) may help... > > Thanks & Regards > Somnath > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ding Dinghua > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 3:00 AM > To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: More ondisk_finisher thread? > > Hi: > Now we are doing some ceph performance tuning work, our setup has ten ceph > nodes, and SSD as journal, HDD for filestore, and ceph version is 0.80.9. > We run fio in virtual maching with random 4KB write workload, we find that > It took about 1ms in average for ondisk_finisher, while journal write only > took 0.4ms, so I think it's unreasonable. > Since ondisk callback will be called with pg lock held, If pg lock has > been grabbed by another thread(for example, osd->op_wq), all ondisk callback > will be delayed, then all write op will be delayed. > I found that op_commit must be called with pg lock, so what about > increase the ondisk_finisher thread number, so ondisk callback can be less > likely to be delayed. > > -- > Ding Dinghua > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the > body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > ________________________________ > > PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is > intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the > reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that you have received this message in error and that any review, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy > any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or > electronically stored copies). > -- Best Regards, Wheat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
