Sorry for the noise.
I have find out the cause in our setup and case: We gathered too many
logs in our RADOS IO path, and the latency seems to be
reasonable(about 0.026 ms) if we don't gather that many logs...
2015-08-05 20:29 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil <s...@newdream.net>:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Ding Dinghua wrote:
>> 2015-08-05 0:13 GMT+08:00 Somnath Roy <somnath....@sandisk.com>:
>> > Yes, it has to re-acquire pg_lock today..
>> > But, between journal write and initiating the ondisk ack, there is one
>> > context switche in the code path. So, I guess the pg_lock is not the only
>> > one that is causing this 1 ms delay...
>> > Not sure increasing the finisher threads will help in the pg_lock case as
>> > it will be more or less serialized by this pg_lock..
>> My concern is, if pg lock of pg A has been grabbed, not only ondisk
>> callback of pg A is delayed, since ondisk_finisher has only one
>> thread, ondisk callback of other pgs will be delayed too.
>
> I wonder if an optimistic approach might help here by making the
> completion synchronous and doing something like
>
> if (pg->lock.TryLock()) {
> pg->_finish_thing(completion->op);
> delete completion;
> } else {
> finisher.queue(completion);
> }
>
> or whatever. We'd need to ensure that we aren't holding any lock or
> throttle budget that the pg could deadlock against.
>
> sage
--
Ding Dinghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
