> 
> Package based Ceph deployments, while popular, are not a good choice
> in general. The very simple reason is that it makes upgrades more
> dangerous: you can unintentionally upgrade services in the wrong order
> due to failovers.

Or when a node crashes / reboots during an upgrade.  This has happened to me.


> I'd be interested to hear ways in which we could make containers more
> attractive (developer tooling, lower overhead, etc.) rather than ways
> to return to a fundamentally flawed package based orchestration
> framework.

^ This
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to