> On Nov 21, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Marc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>> Package based Ceph deployments, while popular, are not a good choice >>> in general. The very simple reason is that it makes upgrades more >>> dangerous: you can unintentionally upgrade services in the wrong order >>> due to failovers. >> >> Or when a node crashes / reboots during an upgrade. This has happened >> to me. >> >> > > Hmmm, that is not really nice to read that ceph is so picky that everything > can go wrong with just a minor update on a single node.
Then if you really want to stick with package installs, deploy every service on a separate node. Your DC runneth over. > I am not sure if that is a good direction for development. Hence the increasing motivations for container installations, which are by nature immune from this dynamic. > I would expect ceph to be more robust. It's not a function of Ceph, but robustness is exactly the goal. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
