> > > > > Package based Ceph deployments, while popular, are not a good choice > > in general. The very simple reason is that it makes upgrades more > > dangerous: you can unintentionally upgrade services in the wrong order > > due to failovers. > > Or when a node crashes / reboots during an upgrade. This has happened > to me. > >
Hmmm, that is not really nice to read that ceph is so picky that everything can go wrong with just a minor update on a single node. I am not sure if that is a good direction for development. I would expect ceph to be more robust. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
