Hi, There is also https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki <https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki>
I find it quite useful for building deb/rpm. What would be useful for the community per se would be if you made a Dockerfile for each type of combination, i.e. Ubuntu trusty / 10.0.3 and so forth. That way anyone could just docker run ceph/compile-ubuntu-trusty-10.0.3 and that would be it. I don’t think that would even be tough to do. I’m unsure how well you can test that it’s not tampered with, but I assume it’s possible to solve, or at least set up trusts between a contributor and the repo. Regards, Josef > On 29 Feb 2016, at 14:28, Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Odintsov Vladislav <vlodint...@croc.ru > <mailto:vlodint...@croc.ru>> wrote: >> Can you please provide right way for building rpm packages? > > It's documented here: > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/build-ceph/#rpm-package-manager > <http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/build-ceph/#rpm-package-manager> > > For 0.94.6 you need to change the .spec file to use .tar.gz (because > there was no .bz2 published for some reason). And then also grab > init-ceph.in-fedora.patch from here: > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ceph/ceph/master/rpm/init-ceph.in-fedora.patch > > <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ceph/ceph/master/rpm/init-ceph.in-fedora.patch> > > BTW, I've put our build here: > http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/internal/repos/ceph6-stable/x86_64/os/ > <http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/internal/repos/ceph6-stable/x86_64/os/> > These are unsigned, untested and come with no warranty, no guarantees > of any sort. And IMHO, no third party build would ever to give that > warm fuzzy trust-it-with-my-data feeling like a ceph.com <http://ceph.com/> > build would > ;) > > Moving forward, it would be great if the required community effort > could be put to work to get ceph.com <http://ceph.com/> el6 (and other) > builds. For el6 > in particular there is also the option to help out the Centos Storage > SIG to produce builds. I don't have a good feeling which direction is > better ... maybe both. > > -- Dan > CERN IT Storage Group > > >> ________________________________ >> Regards, >> >> Vladislav Odintsov >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11 >> To: Odintsov Vladislav >> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users; >> Sage Weil >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released >> >> Can we make any kind of general procedure to make packages so that almost >> everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce developers >> work load caused by too much requirement -; >> >> Cheers, >> Shinobu >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Odintsov Vladislav" <vlodint...@croc.ru> >> To: "Franklin M. Siler" <m...@franksiler.com>, "Xiaoxi Chen" >> <superdebu...@gmail.com> >> Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org, "ceph-users" <ceph-us...@ceph.com>, "Sage >> Weil" <s...@redhat.com> >> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:04:02 PM >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released >> >> Hi all, >> >> should we build el6 packages ourself or, it's hoped that these packages >> would be built officially by community? >> >> ________________________________ >> Regards, >> >> Vladislav Odintsov >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org <ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org> on >> behalf of Franklin M. Siler <m...@franksiler.com> >> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 05:03 >> To: Xiaoxi Chen >> Cc: Alfredo Deza; Dan van der Ster; Sage Weil; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; >> ceph-users >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released >> >> On Feb 25, 2016, at 1839, Xiaoxi Chen <superdebu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Will we build package for ubuntu 12.04 (Precise)? >>> Seems it also doesnt show in the repo >> >> The Ceph packages provided by Ubuntu are old. However, the Ceph project >> publishes its own packages. >> >> http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/precise/ >> >> so repo lines for sources.list would be, I think: >> >> deb http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main >> deb-src http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Frank Siler >> Siler Industrial Analytics >> 314.799.9405-- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
