Maybe the reverse is possible, where we as a community lend out computing 
resources that the central build system could use.

> On 29 Feb 2016, at 14:38, Josef Johansson <jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There is also https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki 
> <https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/wiki>
> 
> I find it quite useful for building deb/rpm.
> 
> What would be useful for the community per se would be if you made a 
> Dockerfile for each type of combination, i.e. Ubuntu trusty / 10.0.3 and so 
> forth.
> 
> That way anyone could just docker run ceph/compile-ubuntu-trusty-10.0.3 and 
> that would be it.
> 
> I don’t think that would even be tough to do.
> 
> I’m unsure how well you can test that it’s not tampered with, but I assume 
> it’s possible to solve, or at least set up trusts between a contributor and 
> the repo. 
> 
> Regards,
> Josef
> 
>> On 29 Feb 2016, at 14:28, Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com 
>> <mailto:d...@vanderster.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Odintsov Vladislav <vlodint...@croc.ru 
>> <mailto:vlodint...@croc.ru>> wrote:
>>> Can you please provide right way for building rpm packages?
>> 
>> It's documented here:
>> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/build-ceph/#rpm-package-manager 
>> <http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/build-ceph/#rpm-package-manager>
>> 
>> For 0.94.6 you need to change the .spec file to use .tar.gz (because
>> there was no .bz2 published for some reason). And then also grab
>> init-ceph.in-fedora.patch from here:
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ceph/ceph/master/rpm/init-ceph.in-fedora.patch
>>  
>> <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ceph/ceph/master/rpm/init-ceph.in-fedora.patch>
>> 
>> BTW, I've put our build here:
>> http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/internal/repos/ceph6-stable/x86_64/os/ 
>> <http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/internal/repos/ceph6-stable/x86_64/os/>
>> These are unsigned, untested and come with no warranty, no guarantees
>> of any sort. And IMHO, no third party build would ever to give that
>> warm fuzzy trust-it-with-my-data feeling like a ceph.com <http://ceph.com/> 
>> build would
>> ;)
>> 
>> Moving forward, it would be great if the required community effort
>> could be put to work to get ceph.com <http://ceph.com/> el6 (and other) 
>> builds. For el6
>> in particular there is also the option to help out the Centos Storage
>> SIG to produce builds. I don't have a good feeling which direction is
>> better ... maybe both.
>> 
>> -- Dan
>> CERN IT Storage Group
>> 
>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com <mailto:ski...@redhat.com>>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11
>>> To: Odintsov Vladislav
>>> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org 
>>> <mailto:ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>; ceph-users; Sage Weil
>>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
>>> 
>>> Can we make any kind of general procedure to make packages so that almost 
>>> everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce developers 
>>> work load caused by too much requirement -;
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Shinobu
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Odintsov Vladislav" <vlodint...@croc.ru <mailto:vlodint...@croc.ru>>
>>> To: "Franklin M. Siler" <m...@franksiler.com <mailto:m...@franksiler.com>>, 
>>> "Xiaoxi Chen" <superdebu...@gmail.com <mailto:superdebu...@gmail.com>>
>>> Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org <mailto:ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>, 
>>> "ceph-users" <ceph-us...@ceph.com <mailto:ceph-us...@ceph.com>>, "Sage 
>>> Weil" <s...@redhat.com <mailto:s...@redhat.com>>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:04:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> should we build el6 packages ourself or, it's hoped that these packages 
>>> would be built officially by community?
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Vladislav Odintsov
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
>>> <mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org> <ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
>>> <mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org>> on behalf of Franklin M. Siler 
>>> <m...@franksiler.com <mailto:m...@franksiler.com>>
>>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 05:03
>>> To: Xiaoxi Chen
>>> Cc: Alfredo Deza; Dan van der Ster; Sage Weil; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org 
>>> <mailto:ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>; ceph-users
>>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released
>>> 
>>> On Feb 25, 2016, at 1839, Xiaoxi Chen <superdebu...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:superdebu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Will we build package for ubuntu 12.04 (Precise)?
>>>> Seems it also doesnt show in the repo
>>> 
>>> The Ceph packages provided by Ubuntu are old.  However, the Ceph project 
>>> publishes its own packages.
>>> 
>>> http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/precise/ 
>>> <http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/precise/>
>>> 
>>> so repo lines for sources.list would be, I think:
>>> 
>>> deb http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main
>>> deb-src http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Frank Siler
>>> Siler Industrial Analytics
>>> 314.799.9405--
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 
>> <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to