The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or by the 
buildpackage teuthology task in a central place. Because these packages are 
built, for development versions as well as stable versions[2]. And they are 
tested via teuthology. The packages that are published on http://ceph.com/ are 
rebuilt from scratch, using the process that Alfredo described. This is fine 
for the supported platforms and for the stable releases. But for the 
development releases and the platforms that are no longer supported but still 
built by gibuilders, we could just copy the packages over.

Does that sound sensible ?

Hi Loic:

Community packages for "deprecated" platforms ("deprecated" in the sense that the Ceph developers are no longer testing on them) would be welcomed by many, I imagine. And the additional workload for the Stable Releases team is not large. The question is, where will the packages be copied *to*?

--
Nathan Cutler
Software Engineer Distributed Storage
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Tel.: +420 284 084 037
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to