On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Marcus Furlong <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 20 July 2017 at 12:49, Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18/07/17 05:08, Marcus Furlong wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 March 2017 at 05:51, Dan van der Ster <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Apologies for reviving an old thread, but I figured out what happened
>>> and never documented it, so I thought an update might be useful.
>>
>>
>> [snip detailed debugging]
>>
>> Thanks for getting to the bottom of this. Have you reported it to the sgdisk
>> authors, please? It'd be good to get it fixed :)
>
> I have reported it, and Rod (CC:d) has pointed out that this is

Could you share where you reported it?

> probably an XFS filesystem driver bug. Given that this _only_ occurs with
> XFS, that is probably correct. I have not reported upstream though.
>
> As a workaround in sgdisk, I mentioned that these two sgdisk options
> together (which ceph-deploy uses):
>
>  --largest-new=1 --set-alignment=2048
>
> could create a partition that uses the largest available block of
> space, within the constraints of aligning the start _and_ end
> boundaries of that partition. If it did that, it would workaround the
> filesystem driver bug. That was what I expected would happen, but it
> looks like `--set-alignment` only aligns the beginning of the
> partition.
>
> Regards,
> Marcus.
>
> --
> Marcus Furlong
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



-- 
Cheers,
Brad
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to