I wonder when EMC/Netapp are going to start giving away production ready bits that fit into your architecture????
At least support for this feature is coming in the near term. I say keep on keepin on. Kudos to the ceph team (and maybe more teams) for taking care of the hard stuff for us. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Samuel Soulard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > That's awesome. Keep up the good work guys, we all love the work you are > doing with that software!! > > Sam > > On Mar 1, 2018 09:11, "Jason Dillaman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's very high on our priority list to get a solution merged in the >> upstream kernel. There was a proposal to use DLM to distribute the PGR >> state between target gateways (a la the SCST target) and it's quite >> possible that would have the least amount of upstream resistance since >> it would work for all backends and not just RBD. We, of course, would >> love to just use the Ceph cluster to distribute the state information >> instead of requiring a bolt-on DLM (with its STONITH error handling), >> but we'll take what we can get (merged). >> >> I believe SUSE uses a custom downstream kernel that stores the PGR >> state in the Ceph cluster but requires two round-trips to the cluster >> for each IO (first to verify the PGR state and the second to perform >> the IO). The PetaSAN project is built on top of these custom kernel >> patches as well, I believe. >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Samuel Soulard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On another note, is there any work being done for persistent group >> > reservations support for Ceph/LIO compatibility? Or just a rough >> estimate :) >> > >> > Would love to see Redhat/Ceph support this type of setup. I know Suse >> > supports it as of late. >> > >> > Sam >> > >> > On Mar 1, 2018 07:33, "Kai Wagner" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I totally understand and see your frustration here, but you've to keep >> >> in mind that this is an Open Source project with a lots of volunteers. >> >> If you have a really urgent need, you have the possibility to develop >> >> such a feature on your own or you've to buy someone who could do the >> >> work for you. >> >> >> >> It's a long journey but it seems like it finally comes to an end. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 03/01/2018 01:26 PM, Max Cuttins wrote: >> >> > It's obvious that Citrix in not anymore belivable. >> >> > However, at least Ceph should have added iSCSI to it's platform >> during >> >> > all these years. >> >> > Ceph is awesome, so why just don't kill all the competitors make it >> >> > compatible even with washingmachine? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, >> HRB >> >> 21284 (AG Nürnberg) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> ceph-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jason >> > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
